When is rotational energy conserved?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves four skaters who, after one stops abruptly, rotate about that skater. The original poster questions the conservation of energy in this scenario and contrasts it with another situation involving a rod tipping over, where potential energy is converted to rotational kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and angular momentum, questioning why energy conservation applies in one scenario but not the other. They discuss the application of forces and the implications for energy conservation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and seeking to clarify the conditions under which energy conservation is applicable. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differences in energy conservation between the two scenarios, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and conditions for conservation of energy and angular momentum in different physical setups, highlighting the complexity of the concepts involved.

Jimmy25
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four 60 kg skaters join hands and skate down an ice rink at 4.6 m/s. Side by side, they form a line 6 m long. The skater at one end stops abruptly, and the line proceeds to rotate rigidly about that skater. Find the linear speed of the outermost skater.

The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was equate the initial kinetic with the final rotational energy. This does not jive with the answer and the solutions say to use conservation of angular momentum.

Why isn't energy conserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take this problem, and see it as a rigid rod partitioned into 4 parts; one for each skater.

A force is exerted at the center of the right-most partition. The force on the rod changes the kinetic energy of the rod. So energy is not conserved.

As this force is applied 3/8ths of the rod's length from its center of mass, angular momentum is not conserved.
 
Last edited:
Another question involves a rod which is initially standing on end. It tips over with the bottom of the rod attached to the ground. In this case all the potential energy of the rod is converted to rotational kinetic energy.

How can I distinguish between these two types of problems? (ie how do I recognize when I can use conservation of energy). They both effectively involve a rotating rod about a fixed axis.
 
Jimmy25 said:
Another question involves a rod which is initially standing on end. It tips over with the bottom of the rod attached to the ground. In this case all the potential energy of the rod is converted to rotational kinetic energy.

How can I distinguish between these two types of problems? (ie how do I recognize when I can use conservation of energy). They both effectively involve a rotating rod about a fixed axis.

You seem to have gotten this one. Potential energy is converted to kinetic energy.
 
Yes, I did get that one. However I didn't get the first one because I don't understand how energy is conserved in one but not in the other.

What is the difference?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K