When is the 4-velocity useful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter copernicus1
  • Start date Start date
copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about when I would use the 4-velocity for a particle on a world line. I got confused the other day when I was trying to derive the relativistic velocity addition formula. I thought I could write down a particle's 4-velocity in one frame, v^\mu=\gamma(c,v_x,0,0), and then boost it into another frame, and I got something close to the velocity addition formula but not quite. And usually, when we say something is moving with some velocity in one frame, we are just talking about the classical velocity. So when would one actually use the 4-velocity? If anyone can also explain why it doesn't work to derive the velocity addition formula that would be very helpful!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there copernicus! Actually you can derive the velocity addition formula using the Lorentz transformation of the 4-velocity. Say we have a frame ##O## in which the 4-velocity has the components ##u = (u^t,u^x,u^y,u^z)##; let ##v^i = \frac{u^i}{u^t}## denote the components of the 3-velocity as measured with respect to ##O##. Consider a boost along the ##x##-axis of frame ##O## to a frame ##O'## with speed ##w##. The 4-velocity transforms as ##u^{\mu'} = \Lambda^{\mu'}_{\nu}u^{\nu}## so for example ##u^{t'} = \gamma u^{t}(1 - w v^{x}), u^{x'} = \gamma u^{t}( v^x-w )## hence ##v^{x'} = \frac{v^x-w}{1 - w v^{x}}## as usual. Similarly ##v^{y'} = \frac{v^{y}}{\gamma (1 - w v^{x})}## and ##v^{z'} = \frac{v^{z}}{\gamma (1 - w v^{x})}##.

When you formulate SR through the framework of Minkowski space-time, you work with 4-vectors belonging to this space-time much like how you work with 3-vectors belonging to regular Euclidean 3-space when doing Newtonian mechanics.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top