When should the negative sign be included in acceleration for F=ma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brentd49
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    F=ma
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on when to include a negative sign in the acceleration (a) in the equation F=ma. It clarifies that the inclusion of the negative sign depends on the chosen coordinate system rather than the vector nature of acceleration itself. If an object is accelerating in the negative direction or decelerating in the positive direction, the final result for acceleration will be negative. The confusion often arises from inconsistent textbook examples that do not clearly define the coordinate system used. Understanding this concept is crucial for correctly applying the principles of physics.
brentd49
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Would someone explain to me when to include the negative into the acceleration a, for F=ma. I know if it is a vector you don't include the sign. But sometimes it seems almost arbitrary in textbooks when they include the negative sign and when they don't. I hope you know what I mean. I know if it is speeding up in the negative direction or slowing down in the positive direction then 'a' is negative, but sometimes it is not given a negative sign. Am I just missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. I see my confusion now. One only puts the sign based on the coordinate system, but the actuall final result will be negative if the system is accelerating in negative direction or deaccelerating in positive direction.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top