When you can't use conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
Conservation of energy laws can be tricky to apply in certain scenarios, such as when a roll of toilet paper drops while being held. The tension force from the person holding the roll can complicate the situation, leading to potential misunderstandings. It's crucial to consider the exact wording of the problem, as phrases like "ignore friction" indicate when conservation of energy can be applied. Energy exists in various forms, including kinetic and potential energy, which can be challenging to measure, especially in cases involving sound. Ultimately, energy conservation applies in closed systems, and any energy crossing system boundaries complicates the analysis.
lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2
I have noticed that I try to apply conservation of energy laws to solve various problems, and they don't always work. For example, this problem I'm doing now is a roll of toilet paper that drops to the floor while someone is holding the first sheet of paper.

Is it the presence of a tension force from the person holding the roll that violates conservation of energy? I keep making this same mistake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what you have done.
If you can show us how you attempted to solve the problem it would help.
The exact wording of the question is also important.
Questions like this usually say things like "ignore friction" as a clue to being able to use conservation of energy.
Energy can take a number of forms, and in the question you mention there is kinetic and potential.
The kinetic energy will be both rotational (the roll spins) and translational (it drops to the ground).
 
Energy is always conserved. But in some cases it is difficult to measure some forms of energy.

For example:it is rather difficult to measure the energy of the sound made when a roll of paper falls on the floor.
 
Indeed. I could have added that in questions of this type, it's whether or not you can consider mechanical energy to be conserved.
 
Where you draw your 'box' is also important. Energy is conserved in a closed system. But if you let energy cross the boundary of your box (your system), then you can't rely on those equations anymore.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top