Where Are the Neutral Points in a Square Configuration of Four Point Charges?

VSayantan
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
Untitled.png

Statement
Four point charges, Q, -Q, Q, -Q, are placed at the four ends of a horizontal square of side a as shown in the figure above. What are the neutral points? The attempt at a solution
The square is not exactly aligned parallel in its plane, say XY.
So, the center is not a neutral point.

I can not calculate the dipole moments. I would really appreciate any hint.
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,162
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello VSayantan, :welcome:
You erased the second item: relevant equations ! PF culture wants you to provide them -- it also helps us help you

So what equation describes a 'neutral point' ? (And, for that matter: what exactly is a neutral point ?)
VSayantan said:
I can not calculate the dipole moments
Why not ? Isn't that something like ##\sum q_i\vec r_i## ?
 
BvU said:
Hello VSayantan, :welcome:
You erased the second item: relevant equations ! PF culture wants you to provide them -- it also helps us help you

So what equation describes a 'neutral point' ? (And, for that matter: what exactly is a neutral point ?)
Why not ? Isn't that something like ##\sum q_i\vec r_i## ?
Thanks BvU.
Sorry I did not know that!

A neutral point is one where the electric field due to all the contributing charges cancel out.
So, if the square were placed parallel in its plane, the field at the center would have been zero. But it is not. Which I think strains the configuration giving a dipole moment.

I know expression for dipole moments, but I don't know what the coordinates of the two lower charges.
Do you think the orientations of the axes do not matter in this case?
 
VSayantan said:
A neutral point is one where the electric field of all the contributing charges cancel out.
Fine with me. The reason I asked is that for some folks neutral means V = 0. But in your case you want ##\vec\nabla V = 0##, right ?

VSayantan said:
So, the center is not a neutral point.
What makes you write that ? With your definition I would claim it is !​

So you can either write the four contributions to ##\vec E## and require the sum to be zero, or write the four contributions to ##V## and require the derivatives to be zero.

VSayantan said:
I don't know what the coordinates of the two lower charges
If you know them for the upper two, you also know them for the lower two !?However, the more I look at the wording of the problem statement
a horizontal square
, the more I fear that the picture is a poor man's 3D attempt and the charges are simply located at $$(a/2,a/2,0)\quad (a/2,-a/2,0)\quad (-a/2,-a/2,0)\quad (-a/2,a/2,0)$$what do you think of that ?

.
 
BvU said:
Fine with me. The reason I asked is that for some folks neutral means V = 0. But in your case you want ##\vec\nabla V = 0##, right?
yes.
I want to find the points where ##\vec E=-\vec\nabla V = 0##

BvU said:
What makes you write that ? With your definition I would claim it is !.
So you can either write the four contributions to ##\vec E## and require the sum to be zero, or write the four contributions to ##V## and require the derivatives to be zero.
Ok.
BvU said:
However, the more I look at the wording of the problem statement , the more I fear that the picture is a poor man's 3D attempt and the charges are simply located at $$(a/2,a/2,0)\quad (a/2,-a/2,0)\quad (-a/2,-a/2,0)\quad (-a/2,a/2,0)$$what do you think of that ?

So, if I understand correct it is a simple square, sitting nicely on the XY-plane.

But, the potential at a point z above the plane is
##V(z)=\frac 1 {4\pi\epsilon_0} [\frac Q b - \frac Q b + \frac Q b - \frac Q b]##,
where ##b=\sqrt(z^2 + \frac {a^2} 2)##

Which is zero.
There is another like point below the plane, where the potential is zero.
But these two points give ##\vec E=constant##

Thus there is no other neutral point apart from the center. Am I right?
 
Last edited:
Hehe, you typed your reply within the
...
tags. never mind.

I agree that ##V(0,0,z)= 0\ .\ \ ## I don't see why that would give ##\vec E= {\rm constant} \ne 0\ ##.
 
Oops.
##V=0##
will also give ##\frac {dV} {dz}=0##
Of course!
So, there are three neutral points for this configuration.

Hmm.
But the question does not provide such an option!

Thanks @BvU a lot, for helping.
 
Not done yet. ## V(0,0,z)= 0 \ ## for all ##z## only leads to the conclusion that the ##z## component of ##\vec E ## is zero on the entire ##z## axis (not just 3 points but a whole line !).

ToDo: show that the ##x## and ##y## components are zero there too
 
BvU said:
Not done yet. ## V(0,0,z)= 0 \ ## for all ##z## only leads to the conclusion that the ##z## component of ##\vec E ## is zero on the entire ##z## axis (not just 3 points but a whole line !).

ToDo: show that the ##x## and ##y## components are zero there too

Along the ##z##-axis there are no other components i.e., ##E_x = 0## and ##E_y =0##.
So, ##\vec E ## is zero for all points on the ##z##-axis!
 
  • #10
VSayantan said:
there are no other components
In the sense that individual contributions from the four charges cancel, I agree. Well done !

(You picked up on ##\ \LaTeX\ ## too ! very good !)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
17K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K