Where did cotQ come from in canonical transformation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter M. next
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origin of the cotangent function (cotQ) in the context of canonical transformations in classical mechanics. The user questions how the expression for the generating function F(q,Q) leads to the equation involving cotQ and its relevance to the transformation. There is confusion regarding the derivation of the terms and the importance of explicitly knowing the generator of the transformation. The user expresses a struggle with understanding classical mechanics concepts. Clarification on these points is sought to enhance comprehension of the topic.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
I won't write the whole thing(unless asked for from you guys), but I just want to ask where did cotQ come from in canonical transformation.

For instance, F(q,Q) = 1/2p_{(q,Q)}q => \partialF/\partialq=1/2p+1/2*\partialp/\partialq=1/2(p+qcotQ)=p.
What is this? How did the last things come from??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How should we know, if you don't give the generator of the transformation explicitly?
 
Sorry my bad, I didn't know why this was important (if u may also clear that) but it is F=1/2*p*q, and this was at the end of an exercise, and what I posted in my original question, was a remark under the question! But I guess related to it
 
Last edited:
I am struggling alone in understanding classical mechanics!
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top