Where did I go wrong while solving for R_L?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the value of R_L for maximum power transfer in a circuit, specifically when R_L equals R_Th. Participants are examining their calculations and reasoning related to nodal analysis and Norton’s theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to identify errors in their calculations related to R_L and seeks clarification on their use of nodal analysis and Norton’s theorem. Other participants question specific equations and suggest potential errors in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in identifying mistakes and clarifying concepts. Some guidance has been offered regarding specific equations, but multiple interpretations and approaches are still being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are references to external images for circuit diagrams and calculations, indicating that visual context is important for understanding the problem. Participants are also addressing discrepancies in values obtained through different methods.

PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
Hi, :smile:

I was finding the value R_L for which maximum power takes place. Maximum power takes place when R_L = R_Th. Please have a look on the following link; you can see my answer is different: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/7743/imgtb.jpg

Where did I go wrong?:confused: Please help me out. Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your loop 1 equation looks to be incorrect. I see -9I1 rather than -7I1.
 
Thanks a lot, gneill. You are correct. I have made an error.

Regards,
 
Hi again, gneill

Please help me!

1: I have also used nodal analysis to solve the problem. Please have a look here: http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/1970/prob1x.jpg

What is your answer to "Ref 1"? Is my answer correct?

2: I have tried nortonized the circuit and tried to find I_N using I_sc. Please have a look here: http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/3187/prob2s.jpg

My answer is not correct as you can see. The V_Th and R_th found previously in previous posts produce different value for I_N than the one found using I_sc. What did go wrong?

Please help me out. Many, many thanks.

Regards
 
PainterGuy said:
Hi again, gneill

Please help me!

1: I have also used nodal analysis to solve the problem. Please have a look here: http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/1970/prob1x.jpg

What is your answer to "Ref 1"? Is my answer correct?
Looks good.
2: I have tried nortonized the circuit and tried to find I_N using I_sc. Please have a look here: http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/3187/prob2s.jpg

My answer is not correct as you can see. The V_Th and R_th found previously in previous posts produce different value for I_N than the one found using I_sc. What did go wrong?

After you substituted for I2 in the loop 1 equation, you went on to clear the 5 in the denominator by multiplying through by 5. Unfortunately, you overlooked multiplying the 9V on the RHS of the equation by 5 also.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K