Where does a radially falling test particle cross the inner horizon of RN BH?

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

If a particle falls radially into a Reissner-Nordstrom BH with Q<M (i.e the case where you have an inner and and out horizon), then where in the conformal diagram does the test particle cross the inner horizon r_{-}?

See for example the righthand Penrose diagram of http://tinyurl.com/6e54fu2 to see what I'm talking about. This Penrose diagram shows the particle crossing to the right of where the horizon crossing occurs, not directly through the cross X nor to the left of it. I would like to able to see why it doesn't go directly through the centre of the X or somewhere else.

I believe one can analyse this in Schwarzschild type coords in the region between the outer and inner horizons, for radial timelike geodesics of RN we have:

\frac{1}{2} \dot{r}^2+V(r)=\frac{E^2}{2}

with V(r)=\left[\frac{1}{2}-\frac{M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{2r^2}\right]

This potential goes to zero at both horizons and tends to positive infinity at r goes to zero.

It's also true that \frac{dt}{d\tau}=\frac{E}{1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}}, is going to go to infinity as you approach the horizons (just like it does when you approach r=2M in Schw), but this doesn't mean you can't cross the horizon, it's an illusion and just like in Schw if you transform into the equivalent of ingoing Eddington Finkelstein there is no problem crossing the horizon.

But I have no idea how any of this tells me where it crosses the inner horizon in the sense I mentioned above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LAHLH said:
I have no idea how any of this tells me where it crosses the inner horizon in the sense I mentioned above?

That's because it doesn't. A radially infalling particle can cross anywhere on the inner horizon; there are radial timelike geodesics through every point on the horizon. Where a given particle actually crosses depends on the initial conditions of its motion, i.e., the conditions that determine which particular geodesic is its worldline.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top