Where does Newton's stuff stand today?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canum
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Newton's three laws of motion remain valid as fundamental principles for speeds much lower than the speed of light (c) and energies above the continuum limit. However, they are not applicable at relativistic speeds or in quantum mechanics, where Einstein's equations provide a more accurate description. At relativistic speeds, Newton's laws serve only as first-order approximations. The discussion raises questions about the applicability of the first and third laws as speeds approach c and seeks clarification on the continuum limit's impact on these laws. Overall, while still relevant in classical mechanics, Newton's laws have limitations in modern physics contexts.
Canum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Besides the second law's issue with SR, are Newton's 3 laws still considered to be true FUNDAMENTAL laws of motion? If not, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of Newton's laws are considered valid given speeds much smaller then c and energys above the continum limit. That means we do not use them at relativistic speeds and for quantum mechanics. Within their realm they are as valid today as they were 400yrs ago.

At relativistic speeds Newtons laws are only a first order approximation to the full equations derived by Einstein.
 
"All of Newton's laws are considered valid given speeds much smaller then c and energys above the continum limit. That means we do not use them at relativistic speeds and for quantum mechanics."

For clarification... are you saying that the first and third law also have problems when approaching c? Also, what is the continuum limit, and why does it present problems for the 3 laws?
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Extending Newton's laws -- Is the concept of force still defined?
Replies
35
Views
4K
Is Newton's Law of Gravity Still Accurate Despite Einstein's Discoveries?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Newton’s second law as one complete law
Replies
27
Views
2K
I Stuck in understanding Newton's 3 laws
Replies
18
Views
2K
Is Newton I independent of Newton II?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Covariance of Newton's 2nd Law under Galilean boosts
Replies
38
Views
4K
Empirical and Definitional Content of Newton's Laws
3
Replies
117
Views
9K
I Acceleration in Newton's second law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why a book on a table is not an example of Newton's 3rd law?
Replies
10
Views
4K
Analysis of a deformable body and Newton's 3rd Law
Replies
31
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top