Where does potential energy come from?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of potential energy in gravitational fields, particularly in the context of a mass placed in a gravitational field without performing work. Participants explore theoretical implications, the nature of energy, and the relationship between mass and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question where gravity derives the energy to pull a mass, suggesting it may come from the mass itself or the Earth.
  • Others argue that potential energy does not require an initial energy input and will decrease as the mass moves, regardless of its starting state.
  • One participant states that energy results from forces acting on systems, implying that energy does not precede these forces.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of placing a mass in a gravitational field without work being done, with some asserting that this scenario breaks the laws of physics.
  • Some participants propose that potential energy is defined by the configuration of masses in a gravitational field, and that energy is a property of the system created by these masses.
  • One participant introduces a philosophical angle, questioning the origins of the first mass and the implications of creating particles temporarily, referencing the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant mentions that potential energy can be negative depending on the chosen reference point for gravitational potential energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the nature of potential energy and its origins, with no consensus reached on the fundamental questions posed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of energy and forces, and the implications of hypothetical scenarios that may not align with classical physics principles. Some statements rely on specific definitions of potential energy that may vary among participants.

Tumorsito
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Lets suppose we put a point particle with a mass m here on earth. No energy was used to put it there. It makes sense it will go down, but where does gravity gets the energy to pull the particle? from the earth/particle mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tumorsito said:
but where does gravity gets the energy to pull the particle?

It doesn't need to get it. The potential energy will just decrease, no matter if ther was potential energy before or not or if you even start with negative potential energy.
 
Energy is the result of forces acting on systems of objects, not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom and Tumorsito
Drakkith said:
Energy is the result of forces acting on systems of objects, not the other way around.
since we put our mass, there is a force on the system that will attract the 2 particles. This force needs to do a work to move the particles, if I am right until this point, energy must come from somewhere?
 
Tumorsito said:
since we put our mass, there is a force on the system that will attract the 2 particles. This force needs to do a work to move the particles, if I am right until this point, energy must come from somewhere?

In your question this is basically not answerable since you've already broken the laws of physics by placing a mass at a point in a gravitational field without performing any work. In the real world energy is conserved, so there is never a question about where it comes from or what's happening to it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Drakkith said:
In your question this is basically not answerable since you've already broken the laws of physics by placing a mass at a point in a gravitational field without performing any work. In the real world energy is conserved, so there is never a question about where it comes from or what's happening to it.
If placing a mass needs a work to be putted, who was the first mass putted? (i know its an unanswerable question and a more phylosophycal one). However let's suppose we can summon a couple of particles for a little amount of time (like in heisemberg principle, i don't want to extend further more bc i don't have the knowledge needed to be right on what I am saying, at this point i don't actually know if what i say its right), this two particles will create a gravitational/electrostatic field and will atract the other particle, where does this energy comes from?
 
Drakkith said:
In your question this is basically not answerable since you've already broken the laws of physics by placing a mass at a point in a gravitational field without performing any work.
I don't think that's a problem. You can set up the system however you like, before analysing its further behaviour.

Tumorsito said:
since we put our mass, there is a force on the system that will attract the 2 particles. This force needs to do a work to move the particles, if I am right until this point, energy must come from somewhere?
Look at the equation for potential energy. The variable is position. Hence, it comes from the position of masses in gravitational fields.
 
Drakkith said:
you've already broken the laws of physics by placing a mass at a point in a gravitational field without performing any work.

That depends on where the particle comes from. You don't need to read the original post in the worst possible way.

Tumorsito said:
this two particles will create a gravitational/electrostatic field and will atract the other particle, where does this energy comes from?

It is a matter of definition if the potential energy is positive, negative or zero. With the usual convention for the gravitational potential energy (zero in infinite distance) you already start with negative potential energy and it becomes even more negative if the particles accelerate toward each other.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Bandersnatch said:
I don't think that's a problem. You can set up the system however you like, before analysing its further behaviour.

Sure, if you're asking what the potential energy of the mass is. But asking where did the energy come from seemed to me to be a different kind of question. One that would require knowledge of the history of the mass and what actions had been done to it.

Tumorsito said:
If placing a mass needs a work to be putted, who was the first mass putted? (i know its an unanswerable question and a more phylosophycal one). However let's suppose we can summon a couple of particles for a little amount of time (like in heisemberg principle, i don't want to extend further more bc i don't have the knowledge needed to be right on what I am saying, at this point i don't actually know if what i say its right), this two particles will create a gravitational/electrostatic field and will atract the other particle, where does this energy comes from?

Potential energy comes from the forces between a system of objects combined with the particular arrangement of those objects. So if system A is in a particular configuration then you can say that it has X amount of potential energy. Note that these forces don't require energy to function. Like I already said, energy comes from forces acting on objects, forces do not come from energy. So if you set up a system such as the one in your original question, there's no problem is asking how much potential energy a mass has. But, as I just explained to Bandersnatch, I interpreted your question to be one in which you were asking about a system with no test mass suddenly transitioning into a system with a test mass, with no physical mechanism to put that mass there, and wanting to know where the extra potential energy came from.

I hope that makes sense.
 
  • #11
Tumorsito said:
if I am right until this point, energy must come from somewhere?
It comes from the gravitational field
 
  • #12
Tumorsito said:
this two particles will create a gravitational/electrostatic field and will atract the other particle, where does this energy comes from?

It came from whoever it was who put those particles there!

Energy is a property of that system. When you create the system you create the energy.
 
  • #13
Tumorsito said:
Lets suppose we put a point particle with a mass m here on earth. No energy was used to put it there. It makes sense it will go down, but where does gravity gets the energy to pull the particle? from the earth/particle mass?
According to Newton every mass attract each other. For me I go with Einstein s theory, mass is a form of energy and it can bend the space time and as a result every object should get attracted to earth. As there is a force pulling the object downwards, a work should be done to escape or move a particle against the direction of motion, and according to work energy concept, energy is conserved and the energy that is spend to do the work is now stored in that particle. So when gravity acts on it, the gravity persuades it to convert the potential energy to kinetic energy and it falls in the direction of force
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K