Where does the energy loss from redshifted photons go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter josephpalazzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
josephpalazzo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The local energy of the photon does not stay constant, however, the energy at infinity does and is furthermore constant. (Energy-at-infinity is a term used in MTW's Gravitation).

If a photon falls into a black hole, it is not the energy of the photon that gets added to the black hole, but the energy at infinity. So when you think of conserved energy in GR, don't think of the local energy as being conserved, but rather the "energy at infinity".

This is a very rough overview, the concept of energy in GR is quite subtle and is different from the concept in other areas of physics. There is no *general* notion of conserved energy in GR, but for important cases such as photons falling into Schwarzschild black holes, there are useful concepts of energy.

For more on energy in GR that is not too technical, try the sci.physics.faq:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_in_general_relativity&oldid=186756158

might also be useful
 
josephpalazzo said:
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
The frequency of light does not change as if moves through a gravitational field. What changes is the frequency as measured by local observers. I.e. an observer at a particular position in at a high gravitational potential will measure a frequency which is higher that an observer at a lower position will. However any particular observer will measure a constant frequency. The energy of a photon moving through a gravitational field is conserved if the field is static. Lev B. Okun published an article on this topic. It copy is located at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0010/0010120v2.pdf

Best wishes

Pete
 
pmb_phy said:
The frequency of light does not change as if moves through a gravitational field. What changes is the frequency as measured by local observers. I.e. an observer at a particular position in at a high gravitational potential will measure a frequency which is higher that an observer at a lower position will. However any particular observer will measure a constant frequency. The energy of a photon moving through a gravitational field is conserved if the field is static. Lev B. Okun published an article on this topic. It copy is located at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0010/0010120v2.pdf

Best wishes

Pete

My interpretation of that paper is as follows.

Measurements of a photon made by a distant observer (at infinity):

Coordinate frequency w = w_o ,

Coordinate wavelength \lambda = {\lambda_o \over g^2} ,

Coordinate momentum p = p_o g^2 ,

Coordinate speed c = {c_o \over g^2} and

Coordinate energy E = homework = {hc \over \lambda}= pc = E_o

Where g = {1 \over \sqrt{\left( 1-{GM \over R c^2}\right)}} and w_o , p_o , c_o , \lambda_o , E_o are measurements of the photon at infinity made by the observer at infinity.

Measurements of a photon made by a stationary local observer:

w = {w_o g} ,

\lambda = {\lambda_o \over g} ,

p = {p_o g} ,

c = c_o and

E = homework = pc_o = {hc_o \over \lambda} = {E_o g}


On the other hand, the rest energy of a particle with non zero rest mass, increases higher up in the gravity well. Conversely, this implies (from the formula given) that the rest mass of a brick lowered towards a black hole goes to zero at the event horizon. The paper seems to suggest that the rest mass represents the gravitational potential energy of the particle.
 
Last edited:
josephpalazzo said:
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
The observed redshift of the photon has nothing to do with the photon but is due to the relative blueshift of the absorber compared to the emitter.
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top