Where should a second hole be placed in order for the light [ ]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter s3a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the placement of a second hole for light refraction in a prism setup, utilizing Snell's Law: n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2. The user expresses confusion regarding the mathematical interpretation of the equation 2.54 sin 48.6° = 1.0 sin θ2, questioning the existence of the arcsine function in this context. The concept of total internal reflection is highlighted, emphasizing the critical angle determination and the geometry of the prism, particularly the triangle formed with a 60° angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law in optics
  • Knowledge of total internal reflection principles
  • Familiarity with basic trigonometry and angle calculations
  • Ability to analyze geometric configurations in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation and application of Snell's Law in various media
  • Study the concept of critical angle and its implications for total internal reflection
  • Explore geometric optics, focusing on prism configurations and light paths
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of the arcsine function in trigonometric equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding light behavior in prisms and the principles of refraction and reflection.

s3a
Messages
828
Reaction score
8
"Where should a second hole be placed in order for the light [...]?"

Homework Statement


The problem and the solution are attached as jpg files. (Given that the problem depends on the drawing, I think it's more convenient for the reader to view the text in the image as well.)

Homework Equations


Snell's Law: ##n_1 sin θ_1 = n_2 sin θ_2##

The Attempt at a Solution


In the TheSolution.jpg, I don't, mathematically, get how it can it say ##2.54 sin 48.6° = 1.0 sin θ_2## since that would mean that ##asin(2.54 sin(48.6°))## would not exist (but, I do get total internal reflection when thinking about it theoretically rather than mathematically).

Also, how is the leftmost 11.4° angle (from the normal) found to be 11.4°?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • TheProblem.jpg
    TheProblem.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 452
  • TheSolution.jpg
    TheSolution.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 419
Physics news on Phys.org
s3a said:
In the TheSolution.jpg, I don't, mathematically, get how it can it say ##2.54 sin 48.6° = 1.0 sin θ_2## since that would mean that ##asin(2.54 sin(48.6°))## would not exist (but, I do get total internal reflection when thinking about it theoretically rather than mathematically).
The point is that the refraction ray cannot exist--thus you have total internal reflection. (Review how you'd determine the critical angle for total internal reflection.)

Also, how is the leftmost 11.4° angle (from the normal) found to be 11.4°?
Consider the triangle formed at the lower left of the prism, with one angle given as 60°.
 
Doc Al said:
The point is that the refraction ray cannot exist--thus you have total internal reflection. (Review how you'd determine the critical angle for total internal reflection.)


Consider the triangle formed at the lower left of the prism, with one angle given as 60°.
Thanks, I now get it! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K