- #1

Corrado Campisano

- 5

- 0

I was enjoying Zee's book on GR when I noticed the location of this "a(t)" thing in the metric sound quite disturbing to me.

BTW: I experience the same annoyance and went down to the same conclusions, when I watched a related Theoretical Minimum lesson...Here's the setup, the flat Minkowsky spacetime (with the c=1 convention):

Here's the disturbing variation, a metric with "a scale factor":

now:

*can you see "where" that "a(t)" is, in the equation, and what also there should be nearby, when dropping the c=1 convention?*so:

__This view would be consistent with what those people are saying, right?__

**is it just me, or a(t) is just the inverse of the speed of light, changing in time?**Let alone

**: I'm not reading the equations wrong, am I?PS: That's just using Susskind's "**

__it's really what the equations say__*math autopilot*", isn't it?

Cheers

Corrado.