Where to Begin with Self-Studying Astrophysics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cakesama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
AI Thread Summary
A postgraduate student in pure mathematics is interested in self-studying astrophysics but lacks recent physics education. It is suggested that studying undergraduate-level physics first is beneficial, especially if the goal is to pursue astrophysics academically or professionally. For casual study, "An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics" by Carroll and Ostlie is recommended as a suitable resource. The student acknowledges the need to balance this self-study with their current academic commitments. Overall, foundational physics knowledge is essential for serious engagement with astrophysics.
cakesama
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm currently a postgraduate student doing pure maths, and I'm quite interested in self-studying astrophysics!

If you do physics or know something that can be of help, could you please suggest me some reading materials?

oh and I haven't studied physics after getting out of high school, so I was guessed maybe I should study undergraduate level physics first, before going into astrphysics?

any help would be appreciated~

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you plan to do with this self-study? If it's just for fun (and you won't be trying to solve any problems) then you don't really need much physics. A good advanced-undergrad level reference/text without many problems is Carrol & Ostlie's Introduction to Modern Astrophysics. But if you're hoping to study it in college in the future, or try to get a job in astrophysics, then yes, you're going to need at least an undergraduate-level physics education to get anywhere.
 
At the moment it's definitely for fun, not sure if I'll try to get into it properly after I get my masters degree in maths. Guess I'll have to study some undergrad physics as well in my spare time, thanks for the reply~
 
An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics by carroll Ostlie is a good place to start
 
I guess I should have read the other replies before responding. Then I would have seen it has already been recommended. sorry
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
969
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top