Whey new physics must lie around the TeV scale ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Scale
Alkass
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have been reading that we "believe" that new physics must be O(~1 TeV) and not higher and I am trying unsuccessfully to find some ref for this.

What I do understand is that if we we assume the Standard Model is valid for scales Q<Λ , where
Λ∼O(1TeV).At one-loop level, we get large corrections to the tree-level Higgs mass (m).
at the order of Λ^2=10 TeV since the SM scale is O(100GeV).

So, where the need for O(1TeV) comes from ?

thanks

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be new physics around that scale, but that does not mean there is no new physics elsewhere.
The assumption that the standard model is valid over those ranges is just that, an assumption. It could be that this assumption is wrong in some way - thus requiring new physics.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top