Which classes should I enroll in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pi-r8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around selecting physics classes for the upcoming fall semester, highlighting several course options: Physical Measurements, Mathematical Physics, Astrophysics, Thermal Physics, Electricity and Magnetism, and Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics. Key points include the importance of taking required courses first, particularly Mathematical Physics, which is noted for its utility in other physics classes. Participants emphasize the need to consider personal interests, prior coursework, and the standard physics track at the college when making decisions. Concerns about course difficulty and instructor quality also arise, particularly regarding Mathematical Physics. Overall, the consensus suggests prioritizing foundational classes while also considering personal interests in areas like particle physics and electromagnetism.
pi-r8
Messages
138
Reaction score
30
So it's about time to enroll in classes for the fall semester, and I've finally gotten to the point where I can actually choose my physics classes (instead of falling a specific track of classes). It looks like my choices are:
1) Physical measurements, the advanced laboratory class. I have to take this eventually.
2) Mathematical physics, which supposedly teaches all the math you need in other physics classes.
3) Astrophysics
4) Thermal physics
5) Electricity and Magnetism (I have to take this eventually).
5) Introduction to elementary particle physics. The fact that it's called "introduction to elementary" kind of scares me.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should ask your college advisor. However, I personally like to take what is required first and so after finishing all that is required I can focus on the courses I truly like.
 
Useful to know would be:
-The courses you've taken
-What you need to take
-Your particular interests and plans
-What the standard physics major track is at your school
-How much physics you want to do
-The level of these courses
-All the other factors about instructors, subject areas, etc.

So it's impossible for us to reasonable evaluate this for you. Talk to your adviser.

That said, you probably want to take the mathematical physics class, and you probably want to take it sooner rather than later, because it will be very handy.
 
pi-r8 said:
So it's about time to enroll in classes for the fall semester, and I've finally gotten to the point where I can actually choose my physics classes (instead of falling a specific track of classes). It looks like my choices are:
1) Physical measurements, the advanced laboratory class. I have to take this eventually.
2) Mathematical physics, which supposedly teaches all the math you need in other physics classes.
3) Astrophysics
4) Thermal physics
5) Electricity and Magnetism (I have to take this eventually).
5) Introduction to elementary particle physics. The fact that it's called "introduction to elementary" kind of scares me.

Any thoughts?
Depends on what you enjoy.
Honestly, 2, 5 and 5 (the two 5s... :P) look interesting to me and the others look super boring. However, I guess it all depends on how comfortable you are with your physics-- I'm more of a particle/electromagnetism/math guy myself.
 
Yeah, I was thinking that E and M and particle physics would be interesting. I don't really want to take mathematical physics, mostly because my friends who took it last year told me the teacher was really bad. I really don't know anything about astrophysics or thermal physics. Basically, I'm required to take a few classes like physical measurements and E and M, bu other than that I just have to take a bunch of physics electives, so anything on this list would count.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
965
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top