Which Compound Is Less Stable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnnob07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying the less stable compound from a chemistry test involving four compounds with identical C, H, and O counts. The compounds in question have formal charges of +1 on oxygen and -1 on carbon, which typically indicate instability. The participant selected the first compound as less stable due to these formal charges and the absence of hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon. Clarification is sought on the presence of hydrogens and the importance of oxidation states versus formal charges in assessing stability. The conversation emphasizes that understanding oxidation states involves more factors than just formal charges, including the types of atoms and their bonding arrangements.
mnnob07
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
below are two simple compounds. this is from a first semester general chemistry test and there were four compounds total all with the same number of C H and O we had to tell which one was least stable and why.

I don't remember the other two because both had a formal charge of 0 on everything while these two had a +1 on the O (most of the time not a good sign) and -1 on the C.

I picked the first one as less stable because of the formal charges and because I was used to seeing the hydrogen atoms bonded to the C.

Can anyone tell me if I was right and what is the best way to approach these problems aside from straight formal charges?
 

Attachments

  • chemistry_e73460a0982d798e48b7e2efa8d846cf.jpg
    chemistry_e73460a0982d798e48b7e2efa8d846cf.jpg
    3.1 KB · Views: 508
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the top carbon have a hydrogen on it? Please make sure that all structures have the right numbers of hydrogen.
 
What do you mean? notice that there are two structures separated by a bit of whitespace. The top structure has no hydrogens on the carbons. Would you like me to draw the lone pairs?
 
I drew the lone pairs on the top one:
 

Attachments

  • chemistry_7fd8803bfdbb9e59c928e9a12919b000.jpg
    chemistry_7fd8803bfdbb9e59c928e9a12919b000.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 515
This problem is a test of your understanding of the concept of oxidation states - there a rules in calculating these values and it does involve considering the formal charge - oxidation states also takes into account the type of atoms that a particular central atom is bonded to as well as its bonding arrangement while formal charge takes into account soley the bonding arrangement of the particular atom.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top