Which cube members are not in the sequence and prove it?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying which cube numbers are not part of a specific arithmetic sequence defined by the terms 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ... The original poster seeks to prove the relationship between cube numbers and their inclusion in this sequence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which a cube number can be determined to be in or out of the sequence, particularly focusing on modular arithmetic. There is discussion about expressing cube numbers in terms of their congruence modulo 3 and the implications of this for the sequence.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, suggesting logical frameworks and equivalences to explore the relationship between cube numbers and the sequence. There is a hint provided to guide the original poster towards a more structured approach to the proof.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the open-ended nature of the problem, emphasizing the need for a clear and informative condition that distinguishes cube numbers not in the sequence. The discussion includes considerations of how to express these conditions logically.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
Which cube members are not in the sequence and prove it?

2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ...

How can this be proved :cry:

My answer:

an = 3n + 2

Any natural number may be written as N= 3k+p for some natural number K and p=0,1 or 2.

So

N^3=(3k+p)3
N^3=3(9k+k^2p+kp^2)+p^3
N^3=3k+p^3

Therefore N^3 (mod 3)

So as an is congruent to 2(mod 3), N^3 lies in the sequence. In other words, the cude of any number in the sequence is in the sequence. But how do I go and show which cube members are not in the sequence and moreover how do I prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to prove something of the form:

a cube x³ is not in the sequence if and only if ________

where you fill in the blank with something informative. You have to understand that about the question, that it is somewhat open-ended. Technically, you could fill in the blank with "x³ is not in the sequence" or "x³ is not congruent to 2 (mod 3)" but neither answer is very informative. I'm actually pretty stumped as to how to explain how to do this. If you start with the condition "x³ is not in the sequence," will you be able to churn out equivalent conditions such that you can prove:

"x³ is not in the sequence" if and only if A
A iff B
B iff C
C iff D

Until you reach something (in this case, D) which is informative, making your final answer "x³ is not in the sequence iff D". Or should you guess the answer, D, first, then work your way to finding sentences A, B, and C such that you can prove:

"x³ is not in the seq." iff A
A iff B
B iff C
C iff D?

Well, here are a few logical tautologies which you should understand (they hold for any sentences A, B, and C):

"A iff B" is equivalent to "A implies B and B implies A"
"A implies B" is equivalent to "not-B implies not-A"
"A iff B" is equivalent to "A implies B and not-A implies not-B" (putting the above two together)
"A iff B" is equivalent to "either both A and B are true, or both A and B are false - that is, A and B have the same truth-value, whatever that truth value may be"
A iff A
"A iff B, and B iff C" implies "A iff C", however
"A iff C" does not imply "A iff B and B iff C", so
"A iff C" is not equivalent to "A iff B, and B iff C"
"A iff B" is equivalent to "B iff A"
"A implies B" is NOT equivalent to "B implies A"
"A iff B" is equivalent to "not-A iff not-B"
 
So here are some good things to know:

"x³ is not in the sequence iff A" is equivalent to "x³ IS in the sequence iff NOT-A"

And

"any number n is in the sequence iff n = 2 (mod 3)"

So, in particular

"a cube, n = x³ is in the sequence iff x³ = 2 (mod 3)"
 
Natasha,

Here is a hint to get you going: it is helpful to write your candiate number as [tex]N = 3k + r[/tex] where [tex]r = 0, \, 1, \, 2[/tex]. You also correctly realized that when looking at [tex]N^3[/tex], all the factors containing [tex]k[/tex] are already divisible by 3. Now, what you want is to have [tex]N^3 = 3 n + 2[/tex] for some [tex]n[/tex], right? What does this say about the one factor in [tex]N^3[/tex] that isn't explicitly divisible by [tex]3[/tex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K