Which electromagnetic waves travel the fastest in a vacuum?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the speed of electromagnetic waves in a vacuum, specifically comparing violet light, red light, ultraviolet light, and a statement about their speeds being the same. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the implications of the question and the relationship between frequency and speed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between wavelength and frequency, questioning how these factors relate to the speed of light in a vacuum. The original poster considers the implications of the answer choices and the phrasing of the question.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the relationship between frequency and wavelength, suggesting that understanding this relationship will clarify the correct answer. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions behind the phrasing of the question and the implications of the speed of light.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specifying conditions, such as the context of a vacuum, when discussing the speed of light and its relationship to frequency and wavelength.

stickplot
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which electromagnetic waves travel the fastest in a vacuum?

a. Violet light.
b. Red light.
c. Ultraviolet light.
d. Red, violet, and ultraviolet light travel at the same speed.


ok so i thought that in a vacuum every wave traveled at the same velocity, so only the frequency could vary. I know the ultraviolet light has the highest frequency, so i was assuming d was the correct answer. But I am not so sure because d doesn't really specify they travel the same only in a vacuum but it says the travel at the same speed in general so i don't know whether it is c or d.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the relationship between wavelength and frequency of light in a vacuum? (a basic equation). Armed with that information, you won't have any doubt as to which is the correct answer.
If i was considering d, I would state an assumption along with my answer: that the phrase travel at the same speed, refers to the conditions described in the question.
 
are you talking about velocity= wavelength(frequency)
but I am just confused because i know all waves travel the same in a vacuum but i know frequency is higher in ultraviolet which would make the velocity greater so i don't know if its c or d
 
stickplot said:
are you talking about velocity= wavelength(frequency)
You are on the right track, that is the general equation. In a vacuum, it becomes c= \lambda f.
You should be familiar with the units of this expression from your https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2061710,#2" about the electromagnetic spectrum.
so we have;
\lambda wavelength (m)
f frequency (1/s)
c velocity of light (m/s), c= 299,792,458 m/s

So if the frequency is higher (as you say for ultraviolet light), and you know the velocity of light,
what must change, for this equation to hold true?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the wavelength needs to change, so it would be d? because the wavelength of ultraviolet light is smaller but the frequency is larger? so they would all turn out to be the speed of light right?
 
stickplot said:
the wavelength needs to change, so it would be d? because the wavelength of ultraviolet light is smaller but the frequency is larger? so they would all turn out to be the speed of light right?
Yes, as I stated earlier, if you understand the relationship we just discussed, you won't have any doubt what the correct answer is.
 
ok i understand thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
924
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K