Which instrument would be a better tool for advanced physics courses?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the choice between the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS and the TI 89 TITANIUM for advanced physics courses, particularly linear algebra. Users recommend the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS for its superior utility in checking calculations and ease of use, while also suggesting that for most tasks, a high-end non-graphing calculator like the Sharp EL-516 or Casio fx-991ES is sufficient and cost-effective. Additionally, for complex calculations, software tools like wxMaxima and Octave are recommended over expensive calculators. The consensus emphasizes practicality and cost-effectiveness in selecting tools for academic success.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts and matrix operations
  • Familiarity with calculator functionalities, especially symbolic computation
  • Basic knowledge of numerical computation software like Octave
  • Awareness of cost-effective tools for academic use
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the capabilities of the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS for advanced calculations
  • Explore wxMaxima for free symbolic computation and homework checking
  • Learn about Octave as an alternative for numerical computations
  • Investigate the features and limitations of the Sharp EL-516 and Casio fx-991ES
USEFUL FOR

Students in advanced mathematics and physics courses, educators recommending tools for learning, and anyone seeking cost-effective solutions for computational tasks in engineering and science.

cesaruelas
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
This question may be in the wrong section and quite irrelevant for many of you. Anyway, I need to buy a new calculator for my linear algebra course to deal with matrices and that stuff... which would you recommed I buy between the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS and the TI 89 TITANIUM? These are the ones my professor recommends but IDK which of these will be a better... investment for future courses (engineering physics) (they both cost the same in my country, around 200 us dollars) since I wouldn't want to buy one only for this course and then have to buy another one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my experience, get the cheapest one possible. Anything that requires computation in upper level courses does not require an advanced calculator.
 
Jorriss said:
In my experience, get the cheapest one possible. Anything that requires computation in upper level courses does not require an advanced calculator.

On top of this, it has been my experience that if a complex calculation or visualization of results is needed, then a computer package is often preferred in place of a handheld calculator device.
 
Calculators that are capable of symbolic calculation (integration, etc.) carry a hefty price premium. These days it doesn't make any sense to pay that premium unless you need to have those functions in a small portable package.

Really, just buy a high-end non-graphing calculator like the Sharp EL-516 or Casio fx-991ES for under $20.
http://edu.casio.com/products/ntd/fx991es/
http://www.sharpusa.com/forhome/homeoffice/calculators/elw516b.aspx

Both can do just about any non-symbolic task a calculator needs to do.

Anything they can't do, use wxMaxima (it is free).
http://maxima.sourceforge.net/download.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxima_(software )
This will be sufficient to check your Linear Algebra homework.

Later, if you are doing serious numerical computation, you can use something like Octave (similar to Matlab).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd go with CAS CX. There seems to be a lot of stubborn "pencil and paper or matlab, no in between" on these forums.

I have a CAS CX, and it's main utility is just to check if I'm wrong, or to make a calculation without access to a computer easier. I'm not always in front of mathematica or matlab, so I need to use a calculator to check if an integral is correct. And the utility and simplicity of the input of the CAS CX is unrivaled.

I sold my 89 Titanium and bought the CAS CX when it came out... best purchase I've made as a physics student.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K