MHB Which is Greater: $\log_9 25$ or $\log_4 9$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Which of the following two is greater?

$\log_9 25$ and $\log_4 9$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Which of the following two is greater?

$\log_9 25$ and $\log_4 9$

$9^{1.5} = 3^3 = 27$
$4^{1.5} = 2^3 = 8$

so $\log_9 27$ = $\log_4 8$
or $\log_9 25$ < $\log_9 27$ = $\log_4 8$ < $\log_4 9$

hence $\log_4 9$ is greater
 
Very good, kaliprasad and thanks for participating!

My solution:

$\log_9 25<\log_9 26<\dfrac{\log_4 26}{\log_4 9}<\dfrac{\log_4 26}{\log_4 8}=\dfrac{\log_4 (26)^2}{3}=\dfrac{\log_4 676}{3}<\dfrac{\log_4 729}{3}=\log_4 9$
 
anemone said:
Very good, kaliprasad and thanks for participating!

My solution:

$\log_9 25<\log_9 26<\dfrac{\log_4 26}{\log_4 9}<\dfrac{\log_4 26}{\log_4 8}=\dfrac{\log_4 (26)^2}{3}=\dfrac{\log_4 676}{3}<\dfrac{\log_4 729}{3}=\log_4 9$

it should be $\log_9 26=\dfrac{\log_4 26}{\log_4 9}$ (a typo)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
922
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top