Which is more important to you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PRodQuanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Important

Which is more important in today's times?


  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
PRodQuanta
Messages
341
Reaction score
0
To expound upon marlon's poll.
Please explain if you select neither.
Paden Roder
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We can argue that a quantum theory of gravity must include the other interactions, due to the energy scales at which respective interactions occur. Yet I feel it is more important to have a coherent model, than to stick to our philosophical conception that the Nature is One.
 
humanino said: We can argue that a quantum theory of gravity must include the other interactions, due to the energy scales at which respective interactions occur. Yet I feel it is more important to have a coherent model, than to stick to our philosophical conception that the Nature is One.
Good point.

Paden Roder
 
humanino said:
We can argue that a quantum theory of gravity must include the other interactions, due to the energy scales at which respective interactions occur. Yet I feel it is more important to have a coherent model, than to stick to our philosophical conception that the Nature is One.
I think it'll be possible to have a TOE that's coherent.
 
Welcome pat !

I also have the same conviction. Yet, this is philosophical and we must be aware of it. See also
[thread=42996]this[/thread] poll.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top