Which is the best; Pure Science or Applied Science?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dilemma of choosing between pure science and applied science for a future career as a scientist in atomic science. It highlights that pure science focuses on theoretical aspects, while applied science emphasizes practical applications, making the latter potentially more beneficial for employment opportunities. However, research-oriented positions in academia or government may favor pure science backgrounds. Participants suggest that the decision should be informed by specific interests in programs, courses, and career trajectories. The conversation also touches on the possibility of transitioning from an engineering background to research in physics, emphasizing the importance of exploring personal interests and future job prospects in making a decision.
aman.yash
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i am in big dilema of what to take up in near future;either PURE SCIENCE or APPLIED SCIENCE let me tell you that i want to become a SCIENTIST in the field of atomic science. so please please help me to know which is better for me and in which my future is sceure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pure science is just the application of science to itself, so it only another type of applied science. For this reason I consider applied science to be more fundamental, and thus more interesting.
 
aman.yash said:
i am in big dilema of what to take up in near future;either PURE SCIENCE or APPLIED SCIENCE let me tell you that i want to become a SCIENTIST in the field of atomic science. so please please help me to know which is better for me and in which my future is sceure...

From an employment perspective, applied science would more than likely be more applicable than a pure science. An exception may be for a research oriented position such as that in academia, government or private institutions.
 
more like, which is best FOR YOU?
 
"Pure" science and "applied" science have very broad definitions. For example, the engineering departments at some schools define themselves as applied science, however a course in say, applied mathematics is not necessarily an engineering degree.

I think you'll have to be more specific if you really want feedback on a particular direction. Look into specific programs that catch your interest, look at the courses you'll take, the projects you'll work on, look at what careers people in those programs go on to, and look at the future predictions for people who study in that discipline.
 
i am still in a confusion...
my interest lies in doing research in atomic, particle and relative physics(concerned to relativity) in all the three but i want to secure my future. do we have good amount in pure science? can we do research if we have a background from engineering stream?
 
I used to sit with the Medical Physicists of a cancer treatment/research centre for lunch and every lunch, every day, we discussed the theories of different physicists. These Dr.s were practicing their applied physics in medicine yet were able to explore the theories of physics on lunch. And I got the benefit of it!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top