Which Kind Of Regim Will Be Best For Earth People?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Genius of Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the best form of government for people on Earth, exploring various political ideologies including communism, capitalism, social democracy, and alternative communal living arrangements. Participants express their views on the feasibility and implications of these systems, touching on theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that communism offers equal opportunities but question its practicality in real-world applications.
  • Others propose social democracy as a more viable alternative, blending socialism with free market principles to allow for individual freedoms.
  • A few participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of self-governance in communism, suggesting that a technocratic approach might be necessary.
  • There are discussions about the potential for creating diverse regimes globally, allowing individuals to choose their preferred system.
  • Some participants humorously suggest unconventional forms of governance, such as nudism or free love communes, emphasizing community and shared values.
  • Concerns are raised about the selfish nature of humans, which some believe undermines the effectiveness of both communism and capitalism.
  • A participant mentions the historical challenges faced by countries attempting to implement independent systems, citing external pressures from capitalist nations.
  • There is a call for a more fact-based discussion regarding the merits of capitalism versus communism, with references to evidence supporting capitalism's benefits for the poor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the best form of government. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the feasibility of communism and the effectiveness of capitalism.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments depend on personal experiences and anecdotal evidence, while others reference broader historical and political contexts. The discussion includes speculative ideas about governance that are not grounded in established political theory.

  • #31
In 1950 the North Korean regime attacked South Korea. The United Nations (not just the US) opposed it and started the Korean Police Action, as they called it. There was a large coalition of troops from most non-communist countries. The US has not attacked North Korea since the Police Action was brought to a close in 1953. Various countries, including the US and China have been trying to find a way to persuade the North Koreans to halt the developments of nuclear weapons.

None of these facts are recognisable in your ill-informed screed.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #32
Usa had do it the same way as N. korea by atacking Vietnam(N)
the people of the north have self chosen which regime they want but i think that they should united
:frown:
 
  • #33
Genius of Physics said:
Usa had do it the same way as N. korea by atacking Vietnam(N)
the people of the north have self chosen which regime they want but i think that they should united
:frown:
That's as distorted as the view of Korea was! We entered Vietnam as France was exiting, and the North was attacking the south (with, again, the backing of China). The goal was to defend the South from the North.

SA, one caveat to the Korea history, which I consider relevant (an I'm sure you know) is that there never was a real diplomatic resolution to the Korean War, ie a peace treaty.
 
  • #34
balkan said:
maybe the best idea would be to create areas of different regimes across the world... then people could migrate to whatever regime they wanted... be it a religious based regime or idealism based :D
this would be the best answer but it is in humans nature to seek riches and expand land so each regime would then try to expand causing another or a series of world wars.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
35K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K