Which Master Course Should I Choose for a Career in Theoretical Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between three prestigious master's programs: Imperial College London's "Quantum Field and Fundamental Forces," the University of Cambridge's "Master of Advanced Study" (Part III of the Mathematical Tripos), and the Perimeter Institute's "Perimeter Scholars International." The consensus leans towards the Cambridge program, as it is viewed as a strong pathway to a PhD at DAMTP, offering a competitive applicant pool. The Imperial program is considered a solid second choice, while the Perimeter Institute, despite its rewarding experience, is seen as less advantageous for future PhD applications due to its lack of formal examinations and the potential limitations in reference letters. Overall, the Cambridge program is recommended for its academic rigor and networking opportunities in theoretical physics.
Casaubon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear Forum-Community,

Provided that I got offers from the Imperial College London for the Master Course "Qauntum Field and Fundamental Forces", from the University of Cambridge for "Master of Advanced Study" (Part III of the Mathematical Tripos) and from the Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics for "Perimeter Scholars International" - which one should I choose?

In fact I'm extremely tending to the latter one, but I want to hear your opinions.

What do you think about the courses, about your future opportunities in research and can develop yourself to the best?

Best
Cas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you already hold such offers? Otherwise is a rather empty intelectual excercise here!

My personal advice would be to do the Tripos III. If you do well, you will probably end up doing a PhD at DAMTP. There is simply no way that end up better than that. Slightly second will be the QFFF at Imperial, for similar reasons, although the QFFF itself is not like the tripos III in being the "applicants pool" for the PhD.

Actually, I would place PSI at the end. It will certainly be a very rewarding experience. But you will need to apply for a phd around november, and honestly while their "no exams" politic is great in reducing some of the garbagety "just pass the exam" attitude. It means that when u apply to any university you will end up with references letter talking about only how chatty you were at tutorial sessions! Even if you go to PSI and want to stay around, you will end up enrolling at, say, McMaster, or Western Toronto, Waterloo. That means you will spend up most of your time in the environment of such institutions. Surely, they are good institutions, but I bet you will get a more exciting environment at damtp or Imperial.

So that is my "educated guess", in terms of a PhD after the masters I would do: 1. Tripos III 2. QFFF 3. PSI
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top