Which MSc Focus in Nuclear Engineering Best Suits a Future in ADS Research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting an appropriate MSc focus in nuclear engineering for a career in a company specializing in nuclear engineering, particularly in relation to research on Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS). Participants explore various educational paths, training options, and career aspirations within the field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the best MSc focus among reactor modeling for severe accidents, safety and licensing, or reactor and fluid systems, seeking advice on career development within the company.
  • Another participant argues that pursuing a nuclear engineering master's degree would be more beneficial than a nuclear physics degree, as it encompasses practical aspects of engineered nuclear systems, safety, and industry standards.
  • A different participant expresses skepticism about the adequacy of on-the-job training provided by the company, suggesting that it may not cover essential topics like heat transfer and fluid dynamics.
  • One participant expresses a personal interest in thermal hydraulics, noting its relevance to reactor engineering and accident prevention.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the direction of nuclear engineering, particularly in relation to ADS research, and mentions the critical aspects of accelerator physics and transport theory.
  • One participant highlights the need for control of processes and structural integrity in ADS, drawing parallels with conventional nuclear plants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the value of a nuclear engineering versus a nuclear physics degree, with some advocating for the former due to its practical applications in the industry. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best educational path and the adequacy of the company's training program.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the training provided by the company and the relevance of different educational focuses to specific career goals, particularly in ADS research. There is uncertainty regarding the comprehensive nature of the training compared to formal education.

eXorikos
Messages
281
Reaction score
5
What would be a good choice as a MSc in nuclear physics to do in a company specialized in nuclear engineering? Training on nuclear engineering will be provided.

Current proposals are modeling of reactors for severe accidents, modeling for safety and licensing or reactor & fluid systems.

Which of the three option would you advice on choosing if possible?

Is there something I should try and work towards within the company that will help my carreer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any specific reason why your just don't get the nuclear engineering masters since the company specializes in it? I'm a nuclear engineering student and believe me when I say nuclear physics is a part of the field but it doesn't really encompass it. The nuclear physics will be able to tell you what's going on inside your core, but it tells you nothing of engineered nuclear systems, or safety,or structure requirements or of standards in the industry. It's just not as practical as the MSc in Nuclear Engineering in my opinion for the jobs you have outlined, where as licensing and thermal hydraulics and accident prevention are covered in nuclear eng. curriculums it's probably not in nuclear physics curriculums
 
As I explained earlier, the company provides extensive training over my first year. Equivalent to the nuclear engineering degree here in Belgium.
 
Well you only learn fundamentals with the degree so unless they are planning to teach you heat transfer, fluid dynamics, reactor engineering concepts and something about materials I wouldn't put a lot of stock into their on the job training equivalent to a NE degree, maybe reactor operation training or modeling or accident prevention. But if you have to choose one I would go with the fluids and reactor systems
 
It's a total of more than 400 hours of courses.
 
I see, well personally I find thermal hydraulics to be interesting which is exactly what reactor engineering is about. You'll most likely run over some of the accident prevention things over the course of study, because a lot of accidents happen because of loss of coolant.
 
eXorikos said:
What would be a good choice as a MSc in nuclear physics to do in a company specialized in nuclear engineering? Training on nuclear engineering will be provided.

Current proposals are modeling of reactors for severe accidents, modeling for safety and licensing or reactor & fluid systems.

Which of the three option would you advice on choosing if possible?

Is there something I should try and work towards within the company that will help my carreer?

What is your end goal? If none, please pick whichever interests you the most. What do you want out of your career in nuclear engineering?
 
Something I would love is to end up in doing research on new systems. I really like the concept ADS for example.

As an outsider, I don't have a good overview of what direction nuclear engineering is going towards. That was something I was hoping to learn here.
 
eXorikos said:
Something I would love is to end up in doing research on new systems. I really like the concept ADS for example.

As an outsider, I don't have a good overview of what direction nuclear engineering is going towards. That was something I was hoping to learn here.
A program in physics, particular with nuclear physics, would be appropriate for work in an ADS. Engineering would also play a component. One still has to maintain control of the process, maintain sturctural integrity, transfer heat, etc, or basically the same functions that one finds in a conventional nuclear plant.

The key difference between ADS and a conventional core is the core configuration, including the driving system for the ADS. Accelerator physis and transport theory are critical aspects.

FYI - http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Accelerator-driven-Nuclear-Energy/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K