Which of these relations are functions of x on R

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying which trigonometric functions are valid as functions of x over the set of real numbers (R). The correct answer is (d) 2, indicating that only the functions y = sin(x) and y = cos(x) meet the criteria of the vertical line test across all real numbers. The other functions, y = tan(x), y = csc(x), y = sec(x), and y = cot(x), are excluded due to their vertical asymptotes, which render them undefined at certain x-coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the vertical line test for functions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions: sine, cosine, tangent, cosecant, secant, cotangent
  • Knowledge of vertical asymptotes and their implications on function definition
  • Basic comprehension of the real number set (R)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of trigonometric functions and their graphs
  • Learn about vertical asymptotes and how they affect function behavior
  • Explore the concept of the vertical line test in depth
  • Review the definitions and domains of various trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra or calculus, educators teaching trigonometric functions, and anyone seeking to understand the properties of functions in relation to their domains.

Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6
Mentor note: moved to homework section

y = sin(x)
y = cos(x)
y = tan(x)
y = csc(x)
y = sec(x)
y = cot(x)

(a) 0 (b) 4 (c) 6 (d) 2
I thought it was (c) because i graphed all the trig functions and they passed the vertical line test but the answer sheet is saying (d) 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"on R" is referring to the domain of function being all real numbers. Only sine and cosine satisfy this.
 
pwsnafu said:
"on R" is referring to the domain of function being all real numbers. Only sine and cosine satisfy this.
oh true, that's where i was confused i think then, so is that because the others have vertical asymptotes ?
 
no, it is because they are not defined at the x coordinate of the vertical asymptote. but i think that is what you meant.
 
mathwonk said:
no, it is because they are not defined at the x coordinate of the vertical asymptote. but i think that is what you meant.
yeah that's what i was meaning, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K