Which one is the real deal for multivariable calculus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on selecting a suitable multivariable calculus textbook, with specific interest in books that provide a rigorous yet geometric approach. Key titles mentioned include "Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach" by Harold Edwards and "Advanced Calculus of Several Variables" by C. H. Edwards Jr., both of which are praised for their depth. Additionally, "Functions of Several Variables" by Fleming is considered, with questions raised about its comparative quality. Concerns about the potential outdatedness of these texts and the introduction of linear algebra in Edwards' book are noted, particularly regarding its notation. The discussion seeks recommendations for books that balance intuition, rigor, and geometric insight, highlighting the need for contemporary resources that maintain relevance in teaching multivariable calculus effectively.
theoristo
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
I'm trying to learn multivariable calculus,and I've heard that one of these is fabulous(the authors have the same name):Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach by Harold Edwards https://www.amazon.com/dp/0817637079/?tag=pfamazon01-20 or Advanced Calculus of Several Variables by C. H. Edwards Jr.?There 's also Functions of Several Variables By Fleming https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387902066/?tag=pfamazon01-20, is it any better?I like books with a geometric flavor but still rigourous and with a lot of depth,any suggestion would be helpful,thanks.
P.S are any of these book too old,or have bad or outdated notion?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've read a bit of Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach ,it seems to introduce linear algebra with some tedious stuff especially the notation,does that make Fleming's book better?please,is there someone who used these books ,or knows something better(intuitive,rigourous and with ''geometric intuition'')?
 
Last edited:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top