Which profession is more logical?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kramer733
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The debate centers on the logical reasoning capabilities of math graduates versus software engineers, with arguments highlighting that both fields demand significant logical thinking. Mathematics is often viewed as a discipline rooted in pure logic, while software engineering involves applying logical reasoning to develop algorithms. The discussion acknowledges the subjective nature of determining which profession is "more logical," emphasizing that both require extensive logical thought and problem-solving skills. The complexity of comparing the two fields is recognized, as neither can be deemed superior in terms of logical reasoning without oversimplifying their respective demands.

Which program gives more logical training?

  • Mathematics (this can include statistics or applied mathematics)

    Votes: 6 85.7%
  • Software engineer

    Votes: 1 14.3%

  • Total voters
    7
kramer733
Messages
322
Reaction score
0
Me and a friend of mine were having a debate about who was more logical in general from their educational training. A math graduate or a software engineer? I basically said that mathematics was logic but he said software engineers needed to be logical to develop algorithms. So which one do you think is more logical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a highly subjective question. Since they both require a lot of logical thinking, how would you even expect a serious answer? If one were obviously something that required little thinking, it would be easy, but you picked two fields which both require a lot of logical thought.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top