Which wagon reaches point B first and with the highest velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xtimmyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Two identical wagons approach an inverted hill at the same velocity and will reach the same height at point B. However, the wagon traveling on the lower path will arrive first due to its increased kinetic energy while descending, compared to the first wagon, which experiences a decrease in kinetic energy while ascending. Although both wagons will have the same velocity at point B due to conservation of energy, the time taken to reach that point differs. The lower wagon's trajectory allows it to maintain higher velocity through the slope, leading to a quicker arrival. Thus, the lower wagon reaches point B slightly sooner than the first wagon.
xtimmyx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Lets say two wagons is approaching a hill/slope which ends up at the exact same height as before the slope/hill. The wagons are identical and are traveling at the same velocity at point A (approaching the hill/slope). And the hill's/slope's shape is exactly the same but inverted.

Which if any, of the wagons reaches point B first, and which has the highest velocity at that point.

To me it seams logical that its the same for both wagons but as I remember it from a physics assignment in school a couple of years ago that isn't the case and the wagons time/velocity are different at point B.

If so, why?
 

Attachments

  • slopeHillVelocity.jpg
    slopeHillVelocity.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at it in terms of "conservation of energy it is clear that the velocity of the two wagons will be the same at B- they are both at the same height they were before so have the same potential enter, thus the same kinetic energy and so the same velocity.

However, the lower wagon will have increased decreased potential energy, so increased kinetic energy and thus higher velocity while going through the while the first wagon has increased potential energy, so decreased kinetic energy and thus lower velocity while going over the hill. Afterwards, they will have the same velocity but the lower wagon will get to point B slightly sooner than the first wagon.
 
Thank you. It's nice too I still remember something at least. And that both that me and my colleague was "right" in a way.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top