asdf1
- 734
- 0
for the problem:
y``+y=secx
why can't 0 and e^(-1x) be choices for the basis?
y``+y=secx
why can't 0 and e^(-1x) be choices for the basis?
The discussion revolves around the differential equation y'' + y = sec(x) and the question of why certain functions, specifically 0 and e^(-x), cannot serve as a basis for the solution space of the corresponding homogeneous equation.
The conversation is ongoing, with participants correcting each other's terminology and mathematical expressions. There is a focus on clarifying the characteristic equation and its implications for the basis of the solution space, but no consensus has been reached regarding the original question.
There are indications of confusion regarding the characteristic equation, with some participants suggesting different forms and roots. The original poster's understanding of the problem setup is also questioned, particularly in relation to the definitions of the functions involved.
asdf1 said:i figured that if you wanted to solve the homogenous equation, then suppose that y=e^(namda)x
and subsitute that into the equation to find namda which equals 0 and
(-1)...
so i thought that since those two are the solutions to the homogeneous question, then couldn't they be the basis?
The differential equation was y"+ y= 0. If [itex]y= e^{\lambda x}[/itex] then [itex]y'= \lambdae^{\lambda x}[/itex] and [itex]y"= \lambda^2e^{\lambda x}[/itex]. The characteristic equation is [/itex]\lambda^2+ 1= 0[/itex] which has roots i and -i. A basis for the solution space is {sin x, cos x}.asdf1 said:sorry about the spelling! thanks for correcting that!
the characteristic equation is (lambda)^2+(lambda)=0
=> [(lamda)((lamda)+1)]=0
=>lamda=0, -1 ?