Why Are Alloys More Effective for Magnetic Shielding Than Single Elements?

AI Thread Summary
Alloys are generally more effective for magnetic shielding than single elements due to their unique properties that arise from the combination of different metals. The interaction between the elements in an alloy can enhance magnetic permeability and reduce eddy currents, leading to improved shielding effectiveness. Empirical measurements often support the superiority of alloys in practical applications, though scientific explanations for these observations are still being explored. Materials like nickel, copper, and steel, when combined, can create a more efficient barrier against magnetic fields. Understanding the specific characteristics of these alloys is crucial for optimizing magnetic shielding solutions.
miloko
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was looking into magnetic shielding materials. I have the impression that nickle, copper, steel standalone are good shileding materials. However, some people claim that an alloy of these elements (eg. netics) are better shielding materials. Is this simply an empirical measurement or is there a scientific reason behind it?

Thanks,
Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top