Why are Localized Fringes Curved in a Michelson Interferometer Experiment?

AI Thread Summary
Localized fringes in a Michelson interferometer appear curved when the mirrors are not perfectly perpendicular, creating a wedge effect. This deviation results in concentric circles that may shift off-center on the viewing screen. The discussion highlights that while nearly perpendicular mirrors yield a standard interference pattern, variations in wavefront shape can lead to different fringe configurations, including linear or irregular patterns. The type of light source, whether extended or point, also influences the observed fringe pattern, with plane-wave light producing straight fringes. Understanding these nuances is crucial for applications in lens testing and optical assembly.
spadille
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi everyone,
can anyone explain why localised fringes are curved in michelson interferometer experiment with a monochromatic light used, when the mirrors are held not exactly perpendicular to each other and there is wedge formation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the interference pattern of a Michelson interferometer consists of concentric circles, and the viewing screen shows only a small part of the pattern. When the mirrors are exactly perpendicular, the center of the circles is at the center of the screen. When the mirrors are not perpendicular, the center of the circles is beyond the edges of the screen.

[added] Actually, this is only an approximate description, which is pretty good when the mirrors are nearly perpendicular. For a more complete description see here for example:

http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/cabell_f/diffractionfinal/pages/Michelson.htm
 
Last edited:
Hang on there- the fringes are concentric circles (etc...) if the wavefront entering the device is diverging/converging. It's possible to have linear fringes (flat wavefront, mirrors tilted with respect to each other) or all kinds of oddball shapes which reflect the aberrations/Zernike polynomials present in the wavefront:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zernike_polynomials2.png

Evaluating these types of fringes are important in terms of lens testing/assembly.
 
thanx Andy and jtbell..
 
Your source it too close to the beam splitter. You said “localized fringes” so you must be using an extended source. You must be viewing the fringes through a telescope or other imaging arrangement to view the image which is located on the surface of the beam splitter (Born and Wolf, 6th edition, p301).

When viewed through a lens, an extend source produces the same fringe pattern as a point source. (Imagine the extended source being imaged with pin-hole lens on an image plane. Only one ray from each point of the source reaches the image plane, except those destructively interfered in the interferometer.)

Straight fringes are produced by plane-wave light as produced by a laser or a point source located a long way away. If you focused your laser beam, the image will be located at the focal point. To get plane wave light the image (or light source) has to be a long way away.

You could look at http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys5430/phys5430_sp01/PDF%20files/Michelson%20Interferometer.pdf, p5.7. For non curved fringes rp would tend to infinity which would happen if ds were very large.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top