Why Are My Coupled Oscillator Eigenvalues Incorrect?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a system of three masses and four springs, specifically using the equations of motion derived from Newton's second law. The user initially miscalculated the determinant of the characteristic matrix, mistakenly including an incorrect term, which led to erroneous eigenvalues. After peer clarification, the user identified that the error stemmed from replacing the correct term in the matrix, ultimately realizing that the correct eigenvalues are given by ##\omega_1^2 = \frac{2k}{m}##, ##\omega_2^2 = \frac{5-\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}##, and ##\omega_3^2 = \frac{5+\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled oscillators and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of matrix determinants and characteristic equations
  • Proficiency in applying Newton's second law to mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenvalues for coupled oscillators using matrix methods
  • Learn about the significance of characteristic polynomials in determining system behavior
  • Explore numerical methods for solving eigenvalue problems in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the application of eigenvalues in stability analysis of dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on mechanical vibrations, linear algebra applications, and dynamic systems analysis.

Redwaves
Messages
134
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
What are the eigenvalue and eigenvectors
##m_a = m_b = m_c##
Relevant Equations
##\frac{d^2x_a}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_a}{m} - \frac{kx_b}{m}##

##\frac{d^2x_b}{dt^2} + \frac{3kx_b}{m} - \frac{kx_a}{m} - 2\frac{kx_c}{m}##

##\frac{d^2x_c}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_c}{m} - \frac{2kx_b}{m}##
Hi,
I have to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a system of 3 masses and 4 springs. At the end I don't get the right eigenvalues, but honestly I don't know why. Everything seems fine for me. I spent the day to look where is my error, but I really don't know.
zOPIHiX.png

##m_a = m_b = m_c##

I got these motion equations

##\frac{d^2x_a}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_a}{m} - \frac{kx_b}{m} = 0##

##\frac{d^2x_b}{dt^2} + \frac{3kx_b}{m} - \frac{kx_a}{m} - 2\frac{kx_c}{m} = 0##

##\frac{d^2x_c}{dt^2} + \frac{2kx_c}{m} - \frac{2kx_b}{m} = 0##

Then, after plugging the solution ##x(t) = X_{ni} cos(\omega_n + \alpha_n)##

I get this matrix

##\begin{pmatrix}
-\omega_n^2 +\frac{2k}{m} & -\frac{k}{m} & 0\\
- \frac{k}{m} & -\omega_n^2 +\frac{3k}{m} & -\frac{2k}{m} \\
0 & -\frac{2k}{m} &-\omega_n^2 +\frac{2k}{m}
\end{pmatrix}##

Next, I have to find that ##det(A)## = 0
##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})[(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2 -(\frac{2k}{m})^2 - (\frac{k}{m})^2 ] = 0##

thus,
I have ##\omega_1^2 = \frac{2k}{m}, \omega_2^2 = -\frac{k}{m}(-3 -\sqrt{5}), \omega_3^2 = -\frac{k}{m}(-3 +\sqrt{5})##

However the correct eigenvalues are
I have ##\omega_1^2 = \frac{2k}{m}, \omega_2^2 = \frac{5-\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}, \omega_3^2 = \frac{5+\sqrt{21}}{2}\frac{k}{m}##

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how you got that polynomial from expanding the determinant. In particular, how do you get a term
##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2##
?
I get the book answer, except I get 24s instead of 21s.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Redwaves
haruspex said:
I don't see how you got that polynomial from expanding the determinant. In particular, how do you get a term
##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2##
?
I get the book answer, except I get 24s instead of 21s.
I agree that the ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## term does not belong. However, the determinant I got gives the book's eigenvalues.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Redwaves
kuruman said:
I agree that the ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## term does not belong. However, the determinant I got gives the book's eigenvalues.
My bad after checking for 100 times I see my error. I replaced ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## with ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2##
I'm so frustrated I spent all day just for that.
Thanks guys
 
Redwaves said:
My bad after checking for 100 times I see my error. I replaced ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{3k}{m})^2## with ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2##
I'm so frustrated I spent all day just for that.
Thanks guys
I don't see how one gets ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2## out of this.

When I am faced with the eigenvalues of a matrix larger than 2×2, I try to find common factors in the characteristic equation before multiplying out any terms in parentheses. In this case, expanding the determinant along the top row gives $$\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)\left[\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{4 k^2}{m^2}\right] +\frac{k}{m} \left[-\frac{k}{m}\left(\frac{2k}{m}-\omega_n^2\right)\right]=0.$$There is an obvious common factor ##\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)## which provides the first eigenvalue ##\omega_1^2=2k/m##. To find the other two eigenvalues, we assert that ##\omega_n^2\neq2k/m## and divide the equation by the common factor to get $$\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{5 k^2}{m^2} =0.$$Solving the quadratic is trivial.
 
kuruman said:
I don't see how one gets ##(-\omega_n^2 + \frac{2k}{m})^2## out of this.

When I am faced with the eigenvalues of a matrix larger than 2×2, I try to find common factors in the characteristic equation before multiplying out any terms in parentheses. In this case, expanding the determinant along the top row gives $$\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)\left[\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{4 k^2}{m^2}\right] +\frac{k}{m} \left[-\frac{k}{m}\left(\frac{2k}{m}-\omega_n^2\right)\right]=0.$$There is an obvious common factor ##\left(\frac{2 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)## which provides the first eigenvalue ##\omega_1^2=2k/m##. To find the other two eigenvalues, we assert that ##\omega_n^2\neq2k/m## and divide the equation by the common factor to get $$\left(\frac{3 k}{m}-\omega_n^2 \right)-\frac{5 k^2}{m^2} =0.$$Solving the quadratic is trivial.
I meant, in the matrix at position 2ij, I replaced 2k/m with 3k/m in the determinant formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
That will do it. Thanks for the clarification.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K