Why Are Only Maximal-Intensity Waves Observed in Bragg's Law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the observation of only maximal-intensity waves in Bragg's Law, specifically addressing the conditions for constructive and destructive interference in protein crystallography. The key equation discussed is nλ = 2dsin(θ), which describes the relationship between the wavelength, atomic spacing, and scattering angle. The conversation highlights that while constructive interference occurs at specific angles, the presence of multiple atomic planes leads to predominantly destructive interference at other angles, resulting in sharp diffraction peaks. Gale Rhodes' explanation emphasizes that when the Bragg conditions are not met, waves from parallel planes can cancel each other out due to phase shifts, leading to the observed intensity patterns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bragg's Law and its mathematical formulation
  • Knowledge of wave interference principles, particularly constructive and destructive interference
  • Familiarity with protein crystallography techniques and applications
  • Basic concepts of X-ray diffraction and atomic planes in crystals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Bragg's Law and its implications in crystallography
  • Explore the concept of wave phase shifts and their effects on interference patterns
  • Investigate the role of multiple atomic planes in diffraction and how they influence intensity distributions
  • Learn about advanced X-ray diffraction techniques and their applications in material science
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in crystallography, physicists studying wave phenomena, and anyone involved in X-ray diffraction analysis will benefit from this discussion. It provides insights into the complexities of wave interference in crystalline materials.

Roo2
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I took a course on protein crystallography last year and there's one thing I couldn't figure out then, and still can't figure out now. My understanding of Bragg's law hinges on the fact that in-phase scattered waves constructively interfere, and the requirement to be in-phase is met only when the extra distance traveled is an integral multiple of the photon's wavelength. With this premise and a diagram of two atoms scattering a photon, it becomes apparent that nλ = 2dsin(θ).

What I don't understand is why only maximal-intensity waves are observed. Unless the two waves are π radians out of phase, there should still be some constructive interference that gives rise to amplitude at the detector plate. Therefore, there should be some intensity at almost any value of θ. The wikipedia page on Bragg's law acknowledges this fact:

It should be taken into account that if only two planes of atoms were diffracting, as shown in the pictures, then the transition from constructive to destructive interference would be gradual as the angle is varied. However, since many atomic planes are interfering in real materials, very sharp peaks surrounded by mostly destructive interference result.

Unfortunately, I don't see a clear and unbroken line of reasoning in the explanation. So many atomic planes means more complex interference... why is that guaranteed to produce mostly destructive interference? For help, I turned to Gale Rhodes' Crystallography made Crystal Clear. He explains it as follows:

For other angles of incidence θ' (where 2d(hkl) sinθ does not equal an integral multiple of λ), waves emerging from successive planes are out of phase, so they interfere destructively, and no beam emerges at that angle. Think of it this way: If X-rays impinge at an angle θ' that does not satisfy the Bragg conditions, then for every reflecting plane p, there will exist, at some depth in the crystal, another parallel plane p' producing a wave precisely 180° out of phase with that from p, and thus precisely cancelling the wave from p.

This is starting to approach an answer but I don't think it's complete. Why must there exist some parallel plane that produces a 180 degree phase shift? Why do such cancelling planes not exist for the set of planes that comply with Bragg's equation?

Thanks for any help!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If there is a phase shift ##\phi## between rays reflected on adjacent planes (distance d) then there will be a phase difference ##n\phi## between planes with distance nd.
Hence if there are many planes you will observe constructive interference between all the reflected waves only if ##\phi< n/N## where N is the total number of planes in the crystal, i.e. D/d, where D is the diameter of the crystal (or better that of domains in the crystal). As D is many orders of magnitude larger than d, you get very sharp reflections.
 
I might be extremely obtuse but I still don't get it. I drew a picture to visualize what you're saying:

diffraction_zps24bdbbf9.png


Unfortunately, I don't see the relationship between

DrDu said:
If there is a phase shift ##\phi## between rays reflected on adjacent planes (distance d) then there will be a phase difference ##n\phi## between planes with distance nd.

and

DrDu said:
Hence if there are many planes you will observe constructive interference between all the reflected waves only if ##\phi< n/N##

From my picture, it becomes clear that if d##\phi## = λ/2, then every neighboring plane should destructively interfere. Likewise, if d##\phi## = λ/4, then every second plane should destructively interfere. What you seem to be saying is that if there are very many planes in the crystal, it is statistically likely that the phase shift from one of them would be ##\phi##, and from another would be ##\phi## + λ/2, or very close to it, resulting in destructive interference and consequent loss of amplitude. However, wouldn't this apply to the planes spaced to give the Bragg angle as well? Isn't it just as likely that there is some plane between them such that its diffracted photons are of phase ##\phi## + λ/2? Why is the diffraction from the Bragg planes "special", and not wiped out from the diffraction pattern?

Sorry again if I'm being stupid; I just don't see it clearly yet.
 
First I wonder why you are asking this question in the biology forum and not in the general physics forum where you could calculate with much more answers.
Now to your question.
The fields of the reflected waves sum up to the total field whose square is proportional to the intensity.
Now this sum is something like ##E=E_0\sum_{j=-N/2}^{N/2} \sin(2jd\sin(\theta)/\lambda)##. The latter sum can be calculated exactly. The point is that it will be nearly zero as long as ##2d\sin(\theta)/\lambda## is not a multiple of 2π because only for this value all ##\sin(2jd\sin(\theta)/\lambda)=1## and no two planes will interfere destructively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K