Why are properties of water so convenient?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ExNihilo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of water and their implications for life and the universe. Participants explore whether the characteristics of water, such as its transparency and neutrality, are coincidental or essential for the development of life. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, evolutionary biology, and the nature of scientific inquiry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the properties of water are coincidental or if they play a crucial role in the development of life.
  • There is a suggestion that if life developed under different conditions, such as with liquid methane, it would raise similar questions about the properties of that substance.
  • One participant argues that water's transparency is not a coincidence but rather a result of evolutionary pressures that favored organisms capable of seeing in the visible spectrum where water is transparent.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the abundance of water is context-dependent, noting that while water exists on Earth, its availability can vary significantly across different regions.
  • Some participants propose that the neutrality of water (pH 7) is a definitional aspect rather than an intrinsic property.
  • There are discussions about the abundance of water vapor compared to other gases, with some participants pointing out that hydrogen is more abundant in the universe.
  • One participant introduces the anthropic principle, suggesting that the properties of water and the evolution of life are intertwined with the conditions of the universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of water's properties, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the significance of water's properties for life, while others challenge the assumptions about abundance and neutrality.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of abundance and neutrality, as well as differing interpretations of evolutionary pressures and their implications for the properties of water.

ExNihilo
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to apologize in advance if I violate any forum rules. I am interested in physics just for general knowledge, I have sometimes a few weird questions that I have no way to find an answer by myself. I hope you can help. Here is the question.

Water is quite convenient as a material. It is abundant, neutral, is essential for life form. We can drink and even use water to wash a lot of things. There are certainly many other properties and cool applications which can be done with water.

Is it a coincidence that water has its properties? What if it is not transparent or corrosive or unstable? Would life develop a different way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
convenient compared to what? coincidence compared with what??

There are many elements and compounds...and some are common, some are "rare"...

we are here...so is all life on earth... because of water../.water is one of many products of star formation...just about everything on Earth is from star formation...especially heavier elements...nobody knows why we have the list we do...maybe other universes have different elements...

Try reading this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water
 
Naty1 said:
convenient compared to what? coincidence compared with what??

There are many elements and compounds...and some are common, some are "rare"...
Can you imagine taking a bath with petroleum? Cooking a meal with acid? If not then water is convenient.

Water has decided to be transparent, neutral and abundant which results in multiple usages described in the Wikipedia link you suggested. That what I think a miraculous coincidence.

Naty1 said:
we are here...so is all life on earth... because of water../.water is one of many products of star formation...just about everything on Earth is from star formation...especially heavier elements...nobody knows why we have the list we do...maybe other universes have different elements...
It's not a reason to not asking questions. People was told the Earth is flat for a while. From time to time a few asked "why?". May be the question was too vague, let's me reformulate:

- Why is water transparent ?

- Why is water neutral (ph7) ?

- Among all possible gases that were created by the Universe, is water vapor among the most abundant?

Thanks for any help.
 
ExNihilo said:
Is it a coincidence that water has its properties? What if it is not transparent or corrosive or unstable? Would life develop a different way?

Yes, if life did develop, it would develop a different way. Maybe liquid methane would take the place of water, and then somebody would be asking on a physics forum whether it is a coincidence that liquid methane has these properties, and what if it were corrosive or unstable. Or maybe life would not develop at all.
 
To answer a few of those:

-why is water neutral (ph7)?
Because of a definition.

-among all possible gases, is water vapor among most abundant?
Hydrogen is more abundant, found mostly as plasma
 
ExNihilo said:
Hi,

I would like to apologize in advance if I violate any forum rules. I am interested in physics just for general knowledge, I have sometimes a few weird questions that I have no way to find an answer by myself. I hope you can help. Here is the question.

Water is quite convenient as a material. It is abundant, neutral, is essential for life form. We can drink and even use water to wash a lot of things. There are certainly many other properties and cool applications which can be done with water.

Is it a coincidence that water has its properties? What if it is not transparent or corrosive or unstable? Would life develop a different way?

Water is highly stable, and the only reason it does not decay, or jump out of your glass is because the proton is very stable. It might even be infinitely stable.
 
ExNihilo said:
Water has decided to be transparent, neutral and abundant

Water decided to be these things? Given the range of all the elements and compounds out there, is it a surprise one ended up like this? Not really.

I don't know why you keep on about this abundance. There are many parts of the world which would disagree with you. Abundance so far as its existence on the Earth goes, maybe. But abundance in so far as availability to life, not so much. It doesn't mean that much if you can't get to it.

The vast majority of surface water is lethal to humans (and many other animals). So again, its abundance in so far as its overground presence goes, is meaningless.
- Why is water neutral (ph7) ?

Because we decided it was.
- Among all possible gases that were created by the Universe, is water vapor among the most abundant?

Vapour isn't a gas.
 
ExNihilo said:
It's not a reason to not asking questions. People was told the Earth is flat for a while. From time to time a few asked "why?". May be the question was too vague, let's me reformulate:

- Why is water transparent ?
This one at least is easy to explain.

Water is transparent because we have evolved to see in the range where water is transparent. Imagine two species, identical in every way except that one has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is transparent and the other has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is opaque. The opaque species will not even be able to see outside of its own eyeballs because of the vitreous humor, and will be at a competitive disadvantage.

So water is not transparent by coincidence, rather the evolution of the visible range was constrained by water's transparency.
 
DaleSpam said:
This one at least is easy to explain.

Water is transparent because we have evolved to see in the range where water is transparent. Imagine two species, identical in every way except that one has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is transparent and the other has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is opaque. The opaque species will not even be able to see outside of its own eyeballs because of the vitreous humor, and will be at a competitive disadvantage.

So water is not transparent by coincidence, rather the evolution of the visible range was constrained by water's transparency.

Well there's my "something new" for today. Thank you for that DaleSpam, very informative.
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
This one at least is easy to explain.

Water is transparent because we have evolved to see in the range where water is transparent. Imagine two species, identical in every way except that one has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is transparent and the other has evolved cones and rods which are sensitive to a frequency range where water is opaque. The opaque species will not even be able to see outside of its own eyeballs because of the vitreous humor, and will be at a competitive disadvantage.

So water is not transparent by coincidence, rather the evolution of the visible range was constrained by water's transparency.

But also, the maximum radiation from the sun occurs in the visible frequency range, so I think the evolution of the visible range is also constrained by the frequency distribution of the sun's radiation. The fact that water is also transparent in this region is a convenient "coincidence". But then there is that "anthropic principle" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle). If this coincidence did not occur then life would have developed along different lines, making use of some other "coincidence" or else not develop at all, and we would not be around to ask the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K