Why are the electrons heavier in silicon?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mindstream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Silicon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The effective mass of electrons in silicon is approximately 1.08 times the mass of a free electron (m0), while the effective mass of holes is about 0.56 m0. This disparity arises from the curvature of the dispersion curves, where less curvature indicates heavier effective masses. The discussion highlights that the effective mass of silicon electrons is ellipsoidal, with significant differences between longitudinal and transverse masses. The band structure and its calculation are crucial for understanding these effective masses, which differ from the density of states effective mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics
  • Familiarity with effective mass concepts
  • Knowledge of dispersion curves and their significance
  • Basic grasp of band structure in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of effective mass in semiconductors
  • Study the differences between longitudinal and transverse effective masses
  • Explore the calculation methods for band structure in anisotropic materials
  • Examine the density of states effective mass and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and electrical engineers interested in semiconductor properties and band structure analysis.

mindstream
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there.

I have a question concerning the effective masses in silicon. From what I've learned, the effective masses of electrons and holes can be determined from the curvature of the dispersion curve at the extrema. Since the effective mass is inversely proportional to the second derivative of energy, the less curved extrema represent the heavier electrons or holes. The effective mass tables give values of 0,92 (m*/m0) and 0,19 (m*/m0) for the electrons and 0,52 (m*/m0) and 0,16 (m*/m0) for the holes in silicon. Basically, the electron is almost twice as heavy as the heaviest hole. Now the problem I'm facing is that the dispersion curves aren't that diverse from my point of view.
So is there a flaw in my way of thinking and why are the electrons heavier in silicon.

Thanks in regard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The effective mass of silicon electrons is an ellipsoid, you are quoting the longitudinal and transverse masses. They are highly ellipsoidal, so the masses will be quite different.

As for the others, you are quoting the valence bands (heavy hole and light hole), not too much anisotropy there given the approximation. In more exact formulations the band edge effective masses for the holes is much more anisotropic.

There is no reason that the hole masses have to be heavier than the electrons, and I cannot think of any semiconductor where the electron is heavier than the either of the holes. A really good reason escapes me at the present, so I'll have to look at some of my references to better explain it.
 
My mistake about the transverse/longitudinal masses. I guess I was referring to the density of states effective mass (or whatever the mass that can be determined from the dispersion curves is called).

But according to Wikipedia:

Material Electron effective mass Hole effective mass

Si 1.08 me 0.56 me
Ge 0.55 me 0.37 me

And I still don't see that big of a difference in silicon. It's more distinct in germanium though.

So, I'm guessing there's something wrong with my comprehension of this matter.
 
It's all in the band structure and how it is calculated. Now one thing that needs to be said, what you quoted above is the effective mass, not the density of states effective mass which is different. The density of states effective mass takes into account the band structure in a more general manner and is not constant with respect to direction in the crystal, I worked it out in my dissertation for anisotropic materials and the originator was my advisor, the link is, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3612 (1983) .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K