Why are there 2 definitions of Magnetic Moment?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
tessx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, this is my first post at Physics Forums!

I am trying to understand electromagnetism, and when it comes to the magnetic moment, when reading around I see [tex]\mu = IA[/tex] where A is area of a loop, which is an expression I can sort of understand. But when reading about magnetic drifts (I am a little confused for the moment) I see [tex]\mu = \frac{m v^2}{2 B}[/tex]. I am sure both refer to the same value but I cannot visualise how.

Would someone be kind enough to explain this to me?

Thank you!

Tessx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't remember ever seeing your second equation. If you found it on the Web, can you give us a link to it, or if in a book, which book it was and what the context of the equation was? (What was the book discussing at that point?)
 
jtbell,

The context of the second equation is in space plasmas, describing the ratio between perpendicular particle energy and magnetic field.
I found the equation in a book called "Basic Space Plasma Physics" by Baumjohann W. and Treumann R. A., Imperial College Press 2004.
What I don't get is how do they get to this expression, and how does it "fit" with the other one (=IA).

Thank you for your help!
 
Unfortunately, I don't know squat about space plasma physics. :rolleyes: Maybe someone who does know something about it will see this.
 
I'd say that your second equation is a derived equation appropriate to a particular problem. Note that (mv^2)/2 is kinetic energy and mu B has units of energy, so this equation relates the energy of a moment in a field to some situation where particles are moving. It is not a fundamental definition of moment like the first equation.