Why Are Triangles the Optimal Shape for Bridge Design Over Arches?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thezi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridges Truss
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Triangles are the optimal shape for bridge design due to their simplicity in construction and load distribution capabilities. They effectively handle tension, making them ideal for supporting roadways placed low in tension. While arches and circles can be stronger in certain contexts, their construction is more complex and costly. Many modern bridges, such as the Jacques Cartier Bridge and the Chaotianmen Bridge, utilize a combination of triangles and arches to optimize structural integrity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic structural engineering principles
  • Familiarity with truss bridge design
  • Knowledge of load distribution in bridge construction
  • Awareness of materials used in bridge building, particularly steel and stone
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of truss bridge design and its advantages
  • Explore the mechanics of load distribution in arches versus triangles
  • Investigate modern materials and their impact on bridge construction techniques
  • Study the design and engineering of notable bridges like the Jacques Cartier Bridge
USEFUL FOR

Civil engineers, structural designers, architecture students, and anyone involved in bridge construction and design will benefit from this discussion.

thezi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So triangles are apparently triangles are the best shape to use in bridges... But why?
I'm pretty sure that a circle or even an arch is stronger than a single triangle. So is it possible to combine circles or arches on a bridge like how a truss design combines triangles?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A triangle is simple to construct. Circles and arches are harder to build I suspect.

Cheers
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27 and berkeman
thezi said:
So triangles are apparently triangles are the best shape to use in bridges... But why?
I'm pretty sure that a circle or even an arch is stronger than a single triangle. So is it possible to combine circles or arches on a bridge like how a truss design combines triangles?
Triangles are simple to construct and calculate loads on (important prior to the advent of computers). Many bridges combine some of both. And note: many suspension bridge configurations are inverted arches.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Here is a picture of the Jacques Cartier bridge in Montreal.
Would you call that a truss bridge or an arch bridge?
800px-Jacques-Cartier_Canada.jpg

or the Chaotianmen Bridge in China
220px-Chaotianmen_Bridge-1.jpg


Note that what one considers the truss making up the arch is composed of triangles for both bridges.
The arch redistributes the loading to the piers.
 
  • Like
Likes thezi and russ_watters
Take a look at the construction of a Gothic cathedral. Note the 'buttresses.' Triangles have an intrinsic tension member which make 'buttressing' unnecessary. Improvements in materials (since the heyday of Gothic cathedral construction) make this limitation of arches less obvious and more easily addressed.
 
thezi said:
So is it possible to combine circles or arches on a bridge like how a truss design combines triangles?
To make accurate (accurate enough to be temptingly stronger than triangles built from trivial straight elements) circles and arches is not an easy ( or cheap) task at that size. Big CNC still comes with horrible bills.
 
just my opinion but when you had lack of materials like steel, arc hwas one way to construct a bridge. Note the arch lends itself to compression. Stones do well in compression. Old arch bridges had roadway on top.
Triangles is great to construct and are great at handling weight in tension. Roadway is placed low and is in tension. Look at the load vectors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K