Why aren't Student Solution Manuals published for Engineering Textbooks?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the absence of student solution manuals for engineering textbooks, contrasting this with the availability of such manuals for introductory calculus, physics, and chemistry texts. Participants explore the implications for learning and the potential reasons behind this publishing trend.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over why engineering textbooks lack student solution manuals, which are seen as beneficial for enhancing understanding in earlier courses.
  • There is a distinction made between student solution manuals and instructor solution manuals, with some participants seeking clarification on what constitutes a student solution manual.
  • Some participants note that while most engineering textbooks do not have solution manuals, a few rare exceptions exist.
  • One participant suggests that engineering textbooks are primarily designed as reference materials for professionals rather than as learning tools for students, unlike introductory math and science texts.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential profitability for publishers if they were to release student solution manuals for advanced engineering courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is a lack of student solution manuals for engineering textbooks, but there is no consensus on the reasons for this absence or the implications for students.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that some engineering textbooks may have solution manuals, but these are noted to be rare. The discussion highlights differing purposes of textbooks across disciplines.

norman_neo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I do not understand why engineering curriculum begins with calculus, physics, and chemistry textbooks that have published student solution manuals and then switches to engineering textbooks that do not have student solution manuals.

First and second year engineering students learn how to use a student solution manual as a supplemental reference and study-aid to enhance learning and develop a thorough understanding of the material.

But, engineering textbooks do not have student solution manuals! Why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
norman_neo said:
I do not understand why engineering curriculum begins with calculus, physics, and chemistry textbooks that have published student solution manuals and then switches to engineering textbooks that do not have student solution manuals.

First and second year engineering students learn how to use a student solution manual as a supplemental reference and study-aid to enhance learning and develop a thorough understanding of the material.

But, engineering textbooks do not have student solution manuals! Why?

What's a Student Solution Manual? Hopefully it is different from an Instructor Solution Manual, which is only meant to be used by instructors.

Do you mean like having the odd numbered question solutions in the back of the book?
 
norman_neo said:
I do not understand why engineering curriculum begins with calculus, physics, and chemistry textbooks that have published student solution manuals and then switches to engineering textbooks that do not have student solution manuals.

First and second year engineering students learn how to use a student solution manual as a supplemental reference and study-aid to enhance learning and develop a thorough understanding of the material.

But, engineering textbooks do not have student solution manuals! Why?

Some do have them.

CS
 
berkeman said:
What's a Student Solution Manual? Hopefully it is different from an Instructor Solution Manual, which is only meant to be used by instructors.

Do you mean like having the odd numbered question solutions in the back of the book?

A SSM gives the full worked out, step by step solution to typically the odd numbered problems.

Similar to the answers in the back of the book except they work it out for the student.

CS
 
What just does not seem to make any sense is why publishers have authorized and allowed Student Solution Manuals for Freshman and Sophomore engineering curriculum (i.e. Calculus, Physics, and Chemistry textbooks), but they do not release these manuals for upper level (300+) engineering courses.

stewartcs said:
Some do have them.

CS

--- Some meaning in extremely rare cases.

It seems like publishers could make a lot of money buy selling Student Solution Manuals for the more advanced engineering courses!
 
Most engineering textbooks are designed as reference material for engineers, not specifically for students. Where as maths, physics and chemistry books are almost exclusively learning tools (you also get reference material for them that won't have solutions).

You will find engineering books that are aimed to teach will have a solution manual. Ones designed as reference material won't.
 
norman_neo said:
It seems like publishers could make a lot of money buy selling Student Solution Manuals for the more advanced engineering courses!

I think the publishers, in the case of most texts have determined otherwise; there is no profit margin, or you would have them.

Good golly, isn't Economic$ 301 included in an engineering curricula? ...Just kidding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K