Why aren't there famous chemists/mathematicians in the public?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stephen hawking
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the visibility and recognition of chemists and mathematicians in public compared to physicists, particularly focusing on why figures like Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking are more widely known. Participants explore the implications of public interest in various scientific fields, the marketing of scientists, and the historical context of famous figures in chemistry and mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that physics may be more interesting to the public due to its grand themes, while others argue that chemistry and mathematics also have notable figures.
  • One participant points out that many famous chemists and mathematicians exist, but they may not be recognized by the general public.
  • There is a discussion about the historical significance of figures like Avogadro, Boyle, and Curie, with some questioning how well-known they are among the public.
  • Some argue that chemistry does not lend itself well to popular science communication compared to physics, which often features more dramatic concepts like cosmic explosions.
  • Participants note that while names like Pasteur and Curie may be known, the public's understanding of their contributions may be limited.
  • There is a debate on whether the average person can identify what Einstein is famous for, with some suggesting that misconceptions exist about his contributions.
  • Some participants express that contemporary mathematicians do not seem to seek public recognition as much as physicists do, citing figures like Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Brian Greene as examples of public-facing scientists.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of communicating complex mathematical ideas to a lay audience without oversimplifying them.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for the disparity in public recognition between physicists and other scientists. Multiple competing views remain regarding the factors influencing public interest and recognition.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of public science education and the influence of media on public perception of science. There is also a recognition that historical context plays a role in how figures are remembered and recognized today.

member 392791
Ok, so everyone in the public knows about Albert einstein, stephen hawking, etc. Yet no one knows any chemists or mathematicians. Are they just bad at marketing themselves, or is it just that physics is more interesting to the public at large since it deals with the grandiose of the universe?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Woopydalan said:
Ok, so everyone in the public knows about Albert einstein, stephen hawking, etc. Yet no one knows any chemists or mathematicians. Are they just bad at marketing themselves, or is it just that physics is more interesting to the public at large since it deals with the grandiose of the universe?
WHAT?? Take a look at the list of famous chemists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chemists

Famous mathematicians

http://math.about.com/od/mathematicians/a/mathies.htm

I'm sure members will have favorites to add.
 
Physics and math are so closely related I don't think it it makes sense to separate them in that way. See: Newton.

Chemistry? How far back are we going, historically (Einstein is dead, of course -- Hawking is not)? Avogadro? Boyle? Curie? Alphabetical list here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chemists

[edit: damn you, Evo ]
 
I think he means famous chemists / mathematicians that Joe public out on the street would be able to recognise / recall.
 
Yes, that is what I said in the OP. Obviously people in science know others, but I was talking about the public
 
I'd say its probably due to the fact that the majority of people get most of their science knowledge from pop-sci or high school courses and, well chemistry doesn't make for good pop-sci in general as its not as "WOW UNIVERSE IS NOT FLAT" type of amazing.
 
Because people don't care one bit about math or chemical reactions, but they care a great deal (or at least can care) about things like cosmic explosions, other planets, and giant particle colliders that may or may not create a black hole inside the Earth. It's all about how well the subject carries over to the uninformed. Plus, people tend to care more about the fundamental rules of how things work than how you can put them together in a million different ways. That's why shows on QM are fairly popular. That plus they quite literally change your understanding of reality.
 
Woopydalan said:
Yes, that is what I said in the OP. Obviously people in science know others, but I was talking about the public
Pasteur, as in anything that is pasteuized, Marie Curie you can't tell me that these names aren't known to every elementary school child.
 
You've set an impossible bar, since Einstein is probably the most famous recent scientist. Hawking doesn't even come close even though his notoriety is buoyed by the fact that he is still alive and doing guest-spots on TV shows.

Still, I'd say it isn't so much physics as astronomy/cosmology that interests people because they can see it. See: Carl Sagan.
 
  • #10
I asked about half my calculus physics class if they knew who Feynman was, and not a single one of them knew..
 
  • #11
Evo said:
Pasteur, as in anything that is pasteuized, Marie Curie you can't tell me that these names aren't known to every elementary school child.

Haha, you think every elementary school child knows marie curie..lol. Most people learn pasteur in their high school biology with the ''cover meat with plastic and it won't have flies all over it versus the one left out in the open.
 
  • #12
Looking around a little more...

Mr Wizard was an English major.
Bill Nye the Science Guy is a mechanical engineer. These guys are famous because they were on TV.
 
  • #13
Woopydalan said:
Haha, you think every elementary school child knows marie curie..lol. Most people learn pasteur in their high school biology with the ''cover meat with plastic and it won't have flies all over it versus the one left out in the open.
I learned about them in elementary school in our science class. I should say any American child in a public school that paid attention should know.
 
  • #14
Never heard of Mr. Wizard, but no kid knows bill nye as a mechanical engineer, he is known as a scientist (science guy)
 
  • #15
I think they know the name, but if you ask them what Curie did or is known for, I wonder how much they'd know. it is, after all, 2013. how many kids these days actually pay attention to science?
 
  • #16
Woopydalan said:
Never heard of Mr. Wizard...
His show went off the air in 1990: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Herbert

Neo makes reference to him in "The Matrix", and being a 20-something in 1999 would put him at the right age to have watched him as a kid.

Lets flip this over though: I wonder if non-science people in the general public who know Einstein's name know what he is famous for?
 
  • #17
E = mc^2! And most know about relativity I think, atleast have heard of it
 
  • #18
they might know that he's known for relativity or whatever but not know what relativity is. I did not know what relativity was until college
 
  • #19
I know a homeless guy who can probably name ten important chemists from history in under a minute. However, I don't know one chemist who can name 10 important homeless guys.
 
  • #20
russ_watters said:
Let's flip this over though: I wonder if non-science people in the general public who know Einstein's name know what he is famous for?
Good point. I'd bet if people said anything other than he was a scientist, they'd probably say the atom bomb. Saw that in a wiki-answers as the first comment.

What is Albert Einstein famous for?

Answer: He is most famous for the atom bomb
 
Last edited:
  • #21
the only publicized homeless guy whose name I remember is Adrian Lamo
 
  • #22
Evo said:
Pasteur, as in anything that is pasteuized,

Pasteur was more a microbiologist than a chemist, at least as far as the work he's remembered for goes. Sorry, I have to jump to the defence of *my* profession here. :-p :biggrin:

Marie Curie you can't tell me that these names aren't known to every elementary school child.

And Curie was just as much a physicist as she was a chemist. Possibly more the former - well, her Physics Nobel came 8 years before the Chem one anyway. :smile:
 
  • #23
Evo said:
Good point. I'd bet if people said anything other than he was a scientist, they'd probably say the atom bomb. Saw that in a wiki-answers as the first comment.

I don't think of Einstein first when I think of the atom bomb. The first name that pops into my mine is Robert Oppenheimer. I wonder if the same holds true for Joe Public.
 
  • #24
No, I'm a physics major and never heard of Robert Oppenheimer before
 
  • #25
I can't think of any working mathematicians today who seem all that keen to be in the public eye. Physics has Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Brian Greene (who's no slouch mathematically, but never really talks about it in his documentaries), Stephen Hawking, etc.

I do feel like really interesting mathematics is hard to communicate to a layperson without watering it down into nothing. The first "whoa"-type thing you could tell someone would be the Banach-Tarski paradox, but even that doesn't really apply in the way people think it does.

An earlier post was probably right - people can get excited about "man the universe is huge" or "wow a black hole is crazy!" but even the stuff that really excites the mathematical community won't be very interesting to most people (e.g. the abc conjecture and Mochizuki's possible proof).
 
  • #26
Curious3141 said:
I don't think of Einstein first when I think of the atom bomb.
We are on a science website, so I would hope that people here know about Einstein. The average American on the street knows the name from jokes and media, and perhaps even know E = mc2 but I would wager that most have no clue what that means or what his main accomplishments were.
 
Last edited:
  • #27
I'm willing to bet Einstein is the most famous for the average joe, and for the slightly above average, perhaps Neil de Grasse Tyson. However, to the same extent, I can't name any famous ballet performer, opera singer, and artist within the last 100 years minus Andy Warhol. I probably can't name any famous Architects either. I'm a culture black hole, thus I try not to judge people for not knowing who Oppenheimer is.
 
  • #28
MarneMath said:
I'm willing to bet Einstein is the most famous for the average joe, and for the slightly above average, perhaps Neil de Grasse Tyson. However, to the same extent, I can't name any famous ballet performer, opera singer, and artist within the last 100 years minus Andy Warhol. I probably can't name any famous Architects either. I'm a culture black hole, thus I try not to judge people for not knowing who Oppenheimer is.
GASP - Mikhail Baryshnikov, Pavarotti, Norman Rockwell, Frank Lloyd Wright. I'll bet you know all of these.
 
  • #29
Actually no, minus Norman Rockwell, so yay my list grows to 2!
 
  • #30
MarneMath said:
Actually no, minus Norman Rockwell, so yay my list grows to 2!
Uhm, Marne, you know I like you and think you're a great person, father, pet owner, etc... Have you been living under a rock? :cry:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
17K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K