Why can lb's be considered a mass and a force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nod32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Mass
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the dual nature of pounds as both a unit of mass and a unit of force, highlighting the confusion that arises from this duality. In the example of a 3000-lb automobile, participants clarify that pounds can refer to weight (force) or mass, depending on context. They emphasize the importance of distinguishing between pound-mass and pound-force to avoid misunderstandings, particularly in calculations involving gravity and acceleration. The conversation also touches on historical and legal definitions of pounds, suggesting that terminology may vary between different regions and contexts. Overall, clarity in the use of units is deemed essential for accurate scientific communication.
  • #31
I like Serena said:
Hmm, I don't get this. :confused:

The SI prefix "kilo" literally means 1000 and is unit-less.

As far as I know:
1 \textrm{ kg} = 1 \cdot \textrm{ kilogram} = 1 \cdot (1000 \cdot \textrm{ gram}) = 1000 \cdot \textrm{ gram} = 1000 \textrm{ gram}

The units don't balance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Phrak said:
The units don't balance.
They do if you consider kilo to be a dimensionless quantity (equal to 1000) separate from grams which is a quantity with dimensions of mass, and the practice of writing them together simply to be notational shorthand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K