Why can we choose any arbitrary point to calculate the moment?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment Point
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of calculating moments (torques) in the context of a seesaw system. Participants explore the implications of choosing arbitrary points for moment calculations and the relationship between net moments and forces acting on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the meaning of being able to choose any arbitrary point for calculating moments, noting that results seem to differ based on the chosen point.
  • Others point out that there are three forces acting on the seesaw, including the reaction force at the fulcrum, which equals the total weight.
  • A participant clarifies that the net moment (torque) will differ depending on the point chosen, suggesting that the statement about arbitrary points may be misunderstood.
  • It is noted that if the net moment is zero about one point, it does not imply it is zero about all other points unless the net force is also zero.
  • Another participant introduces a formula relating moments at different points, indicating that moment transfer depends on the position vector and net force.
  • Some participants express clarity on the relationship between the sum of torques and the sum of forces, emphasizing that equality holds only when the sum of forces is zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of choosing arbitrary points for moment calculations. While some agree that the net moment can vary with the choice of point, others challenge the initial premise, leading to an unresolved discussion about the conditions under which moments can be considered equal.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in understanding arise from the dependence on definitions of moments and forces, as well as the conditions under which moments are calculated. The discussion highlights the complexity of the relationships involved without resolving the nuances.

xyz
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Can someone explain, what means that we can choose any arbitrary point to calculate moment and result will always be identical?

If I choose point 1 ...20kg x 1m = 20kg x 3m...seesaw right side will fall down
If I choose point 2...20kg x 2m = 20kg x 2m...seesaw stay horizontal

So this two moments are not the same...Fulcrum point in nature is always just one point,how then we can choose any point we wont??
safgdfg.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xyz said:
If I choose point 1 ...20kg x 1m = 20kg x 3m...seesaw right side will fall down
If I choose point 2...20kg x 2m = 20kg x 2m...seesaw stay horizontal
There are 3 forces acting on the seesaw, not just 2.
 
A.T. said:
There are 3 forces acting on the seesaw, not just 2.

I know,there is reaction force on fulcrum which is equal to total weight (40kg)..

But what does mean that we can choose any point for calculate moment?
 
xyz said:
I know,there is reaction force on fulcrum which is equal to total weight (40kg)..
So why do you ignore it in your net moment calculations?
 
xyz said:
Can someone explain, what means that we can choose any arbitrary point to calculate moment and result will always be identical?

Not clear what you mean by "result." The net moment (torque) will be different depending on the choice of point. The more general statement is that net moment about any point is proportional to the rate of change of angular momentum about that point.

Here is an earlier thread with a similar discussion: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/rotational-equilibrium-torque-about-any-axis.440631/
 
pixel said:
The net moment (torque) will be different depending on the choice of point.
Unless it's zero, like in this case.
 
A.T. said:
Unless it's zero, like in this case.

Your comment led me to review some ancient history. If the net moment is zero about one point, it is not necessarily zero about all other points. That is only true if the net force is zero.

Here's a discussion of this: http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...red-from-one-point-in-space-it-equals-zero-me

As shown there, in general the moment transfer from point A to point B is given by Mb = Ma + rabxF where rab is the position vector from a to b and F is the net force. So if Ma is zero and the net force is zero, then Mb is also zero.
 
pixel said:
That is only true if the net force is zero.
Good point, but that's also the case here.
 
pixel said:
Your comment led me to review some ancient history. If the net moment is zero about one point, it is not necessarily zero about all other points. That is only true if the net force is zero.

Here's a discussion of this: http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...red-from-one-point-in-space-it-equals-zero-me

As shown there, in general the moment transfer from point A to point B is given by Mb = Ma + rabxF where rab is the position vector from a to b and F is the net force. So if Ma is zero and the net force is zero, then Mb is also zero.

Thanks pixel!
Now is clear to me...This is the key;

The sum of the torques on any point is equal, only when the sum of the forces is zero
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K