Why can't gravity be modeled as a frictional force?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity cannot be modeled as a frictional force because gravitational force is a conservative force, while friction is non-conservative. Gravity acts at a distance and is not a contact force, which differentiates it from friction that resists motion. The weight of an object, which is its mass under gravity, does not act as a frictional force resisting horizontal movement; instead, it influences how much force is required to move the object. When an object is resting on a surface, the ground exerts an equal and opposite force, but this does not negate the sensation of weight when lifting it. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately modeling the motion of objects under gravitational influence.
Ing3nium
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey there, I'm new! :D

The weight, which is mass according to the gravity, and this scalar force keeps the object on to the ground, and if a force pushes the object horizontally, then why can't be the mass according to the gravity (weight) be modeled as a frictional force resisting the horizontal movement? Of course, a tank requires more force because its mass according to the gravity (weight) is greater than a mobile phone, since its weight absorbs all the movement.

And also, if the object is sitting on the ground, and that the gravitational force is canceled out by the equal and opposite force by the ground, then WHY do we feel the weight of the object if we put it on our hands?

Was experimenting with a pendulum, and thought that gravity WOULD stop the motion eventually.

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational force is a conservative force, and frictional forces are non-conservative.
 
Gravity is not a contact force.
 
How effectively does your model predict how the planets move in their orbits under the influence of gravity?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top