I Why can't n be negative in Laplace's equation?

AI Thread Summary
Negative values for n are not permissible because they lead to solutions that contradict boundary conditions, specifically the requirement that V approaches zero as x approaches infinity. The sine function's odd property means that solutions for negative n would merely replicate those for positive n, albeit with different constants. However, introducing negative n would reintegrate terms that should be excluded based on the boundary conditions. Consequently, allowing n to be negative would violate the established conditions of the problem. Thus, maintaining n as a non-negative integer is essential for the integrity of the solution.
laser1
Messages
166
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
N/A
Griffiths Pg 133 4th Edition
1737829932254.png

Why can't n be negative? Is there a reason for this? My thought is that if n is negative, as sine is odd, the negative gets absorbed into C, a constant. Is this correct?

Would it be equally correct to let n be a negative integer?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because ##\sin (-x) = - \sin(x)##, the solutions for negative ##n## simply repeat the solution for positive ##n##.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
Because ##\sin (-x) = - \sin(x)##, the solutions for negative ##n## simply repeat the solutionf for positive ##n##.
But with different constant, though?
 
laser1 said:
But with different constant, though?
The constant ##C## is arbitrary.
 
The solution of the problem is $$ V(x,y)=(Ae^{k x}+Be^{-k x})(C\sin(ky)+D\cos(ky)) $$ where ## k>0 ## and where the condition (iv) ## V\to0 ## as ## x\to\infty ## requires that A is equal to zero.
If ## n ## is negative ## -k ## will be positive and the part, which has already been excluded from the solution by ## A=0 ##, will be included into the solution again and the condition (iv) will be violated.
 
  • Like
Likes laser1 and PeroK
Gavran said:
The solution of the problem is $$ V(x,y)=(Ae^{k x}+Be^{-k x})(C\sin(ky)+D\cos(ky)) $$ where ## k>0 ## and where the condition (iv) ## V\to0 ## as ## x\to\infty ## requires that A is equal to zero.
If ## n ## is negative ## -k ## will be positive and the part, which has already been excluded from the solution by ## A=0 ##, will be included into the solution again and the condition (iv) will be violated.
Thank you
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top