Why Can't Objects Accelerate to Light Speed?

trigonatus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
From a quick search of the forum is appears that an increase in velocity does not result in an increase in mass. If this is correct why can't objects be accelerated to light speed and beyond?

If every action causes an equal and opposite reaction, what force stops an object from reaching light speed?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out our current featured thread at https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-relativistic-mass-and-why-is-it-not-used-much.783220/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An object's energy increases without limit (##E \rightarrow \infty##) as ##v \rightarrow c##.

totalenergy2.gif


As you give an object more and more energy, by continuing to "push" on it somehow, its speed continues to increase, but more and more "slowly" as it gets closer to c. It can never actually reach a speed of c, because that would require an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible.
 
Thank you both.

Why more and more slowly as it gets closer to c? Is there some type of additional resistance or counter force that causes the decrease in acceleration as c is approached?
 
trigonatus said:
Thank you both.

Why more and more slowly as it gets closer to c? Is there some type of additional resistance or counter force that causes the decrease in acceleration as c is approached?

There is no counterforce needed - it follows from the way that speeds add.

You are almost certainly thinking in terms of the classical law of velocity addition, which says that if A is moving at speed ##u## relative to B, and C is moving at speed ##v## relative to B, then C is moving at speed ##(u+v)## relative to A. Using that law, a spaceship moving at .99c relative to A and at rest relative to B could fire its engines and accelerate to .02c relative to B - and then it would be moving at 1.01c relative to A.

But that's not really how speeds add - the classical ##(u+v)## is an approximation that only works for speeds that are small compared with the speed of light. The more accurate law that you have to use for speeds near that of light is ##(u+v)/(1+uv)##; use this and you'll see that even though nothing prevents the ship from accelerating just as you would expect, it still can't get above c relative to any observer.
 
Last edited:
Now, I understand.
Thank you.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Ride Gravitational Waves to Increase Speed?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I A question about the speed of light and electromagnetism
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
I Kinetic vs Gravitational Time Dilation: Perceived Speed
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Do objects gain mass while approaching light speed?
Replies
25
Views
3K
B Do Gravitational Forces Increase for Objects Moving at Light Speed?
Replies
16
Views
3K
B Experimental evidence for effective mass increasing with speed
Replies
11
Views
3K
B How can a black hole absorb matter?
Replies
31
Views
598
B Deep Space Speed Limit: What Prevents Exceeding Light Speed?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Prove the velocity of a moving object is absolute in one IRF?
Replies
22
Views
1K
B Why does it require an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light?
3
Replies
130
Views
13K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top