Why can't photons reverse annihilate ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darkmisc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons Reverse
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
Why can't photons "reverse annihilate"?

If electron-positron pairs annihilate to product gamma radiation, why can't gamma photons spontaneously become a electron-positron pair?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


They can. You need two photons for conservation of momentum, but one can come from the electric field near a nucleus.

The process is called pair production.
 


Why does another photon or nuclei have to be involved?

Can't the photon's energy and momentum be converted into the mass, kinetic energy and momentum of the electron-positron pair in free space?
 


Darkmisc said:
If electron-positron pairs annihilate to product gamma radiation, why can't gamma photons spontaneously become a electron-positron pair?

A pair of gamma photons can produce an electron-positron pair if they have high enough energy and meet in the right way. Look up "two-photon physics" or "gamma-gamma physics" for more details.

A positron and an electron are mutually attractive so the probability of annihilation is high. It is much more difficult to get gamma photons to collide in a such a way that the center of mass energy is sufficient to produce an electron-positron pair.
 


Darkmisc said:
Why does another photon or nuclei have to be involved?

Can't the photon's energy and momentum be converted into the mass, kinetic energy and momentum of the electron-positron pair in free space?

No, it's not possible to satisfy energy and momentum conservation laws in that case.
 


Look at the center-of-mass system. Here you have two photons with the same energy (and therefore momentum) heading towards each other, to total momentum is zero. They convert into a particle and antiparticle pair, which head away from each other with the same speed. They have the same mass, therefore again the total momentum is zero. Momentum is conserved. Energy conservation is easy, you take the energy of the photons, subtract the rest energy of the new particles, what is left is the kinetic energy. Each new particle gets 50% of that.

With a single photon you cannot find a solution that satisfies energy and momentum conservation.

The process actually is very efficient for photons with >1.022 GeV energy. Then the second photon can have close to zero energy, which is the case for virtual photons in a static electric field. For such high-energy gamma rays, pair production is the dominant absorption mechanism.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top