Why Carnot's engine needs 4 cycles instead of only 2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sangsang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycles Engine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanics and efficiency of Carnot's ideal engine, specifically why it requires four distinct thermodynamic processes: isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, and adiabatic compression. Participants explore the implications of using alternative processes, such as isobaric expansion and compression, and question the efficiency of these alternatives compared to the Carnot cycle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of the four cycles in the Carnot engine, suggesting that isobaric processes could suffice for expansion and compression.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the net work done in a cycle is represented by the area enclosed in a P-V diagram, implying that the proposed isobaric cycle may not yield the same efficiency.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that while two isobaric compressions could theoretically work, they would require an instantaneous pressure drop, which would be irreversible and lead to energy loss.
  • One participant proposes a mechanical setup involving a piston and crankshaft, raising questions about the heating and cooling processes involved.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding the distinction between heating the work fluid in the engine versus the air outside the engine.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of maintaining equilibrium with the surroundings, explaining that the Carnot cycle's efficiency stems from isothermal and adiabatic processes being reversible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the efficiency and feasibility of using isobaric processes instead of the four processes in the Carnot cycle. No consensus is reached regarding the superiority of one approach over the other.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the efficiency of the Carnot cycle is linked to the system's equilibrium with the surrounding reservoirs, and that irreversible processes could lead to energy losses. The discussion highlights the complexity of thermodynamic processes without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions.

sangsang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I do not really understand the reason why Carnot ideal engine needs 4 cycles: isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, adiabatic compression. Why cannot use only 2 cycles said isobaric expansion and isobaric compression, i.e. use a heat reservoir to expand the air inside the engine, then use a cold reservoir to compress the air?

I even checked the original paper of Carnot and it explains as below, but I am not very understand for the following 2 processes,

1) use hear reservoir to increase the temperature of air to expand
2) use compression to increase the temperature first, then use an isothermal expansion to expand

Why 1 is less efficiency then 2 as Carnot said?

[Since every re‐establishment of equilibrium in the caloric may be the cause of the
production of motive power, every re‐establishment of equilibrium which shall be
accomplished without production of this power should be considered as an actual loss.
Now, very little reflection would show that all change of temperature which is not due to a
change of volume of the bodies can be only a useless re‐establishment of equilibrium in the caloric.]
 
Science news on Phys.org
sangsang said:
Why cannot use only 2 cycles said isobaric expansion and isobaric compression, i.e. use a heat reservoir to expand the air inside the engine, then use a cold reservoir to compress the air?

The net work done by one cycle equals the "area" enclosed by its path in a P-V diagram. Draw a diagram of the cycle that you described and calculate its area. :smile:
 
You could do it by two isobaric compressions, but the second one would have to be at lower pressure (in order to extract some useful work). In order to do that without another 3rd process, after the first compression, you would have to make the pressure jump to lower value instantaneously, for example by releasing suddenly the load. But such a jump would be irreversible and in the end means loss of useful energy. Carnot has shown that in order to get maximum work form the reservoir, it is necessary to use reversible processes. Isotherms and adiabates in his cycle are reversible.
 
What about having a piston on a crankshaft, then heating the air until the piston goes down from the increased pressure, then cooling it, making the pressure decrease and pull the piston back up?
 
Chingel, by "heating the air" you mean heating the work fluid in the engine or the air outside the engine?
 
Er, yeah, perhaps you should list the 4 processes...
 
Jano L. said:
Chingel, by "heating the air" you mean heating the work fluid in the engine or the air outside the engine?

I'm not really sure of the difference. Maybe I meant heating the work fluid.
 
sangsang said:
I do not really understand the reason why Carnot ideal engine needs 4 cycles: isothermal expansion, adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, adiabatic compression. Why cannot use only 2 cycles said isobaric expansion and isobaric compression, i.e. use a heat reservoir to expand the air inside the engine, then use a cold reservoir to compress the air?

I even checked the original paper of Carnot and it explains as below, but I am not very understand for the following 2 processes,

1) use heat reservoir to increase the temperature of air to expand
2) use compression to increase the temperature first, then use an isothermal expansion to expand

Why 1 is less efficiency then 2 as Carnot said?
The Carnot cycle is as efficient as possible because the system is arbitrarily close to equilibrium with the surroundings (the reservoirs) at all times.

The only way you can get work out of such a system is to have heat flow from the hot to the cold.

The only way to do that AND have the system in equilibrium with its surroundings at all times, is to have heat flow occur isothermally with the system and surroundings at the same temperature (ie with the receiving body temperature lower by an infinitessimal amount).

The only way to have heat flows at two different temperatures (ie to have heat flow isothermally to/from reservoirs at two different temperatures) is to have the temperature changes occur adiabatically.

That, in a nutshell, is the Carnot cycle.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K