Why did covariant nu change sides with mu in the inhomogenous maxwell equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ercagpince
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the transformation of the covariant index "nu" to a contravariant index in the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations, specifically in equation (1.2). The key point is that when taking the derivative of equation (1.3) with respect to \(\partial_{\mu}\), the author commuted the derivatives \(\partial^{\nu}\) and \(\partial_{\mu}\), leading to the change in index position. This clarification resolves the confusion regarding the manipulation of indices in the context of the field strength tensor \(F^{\mu\nu}\) and the associated equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation in relativity
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of covariant and contravariant indices
  • Basic grasp of vector potentials and field strength tensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariant and contravariant tensors in detail
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations
  • Explore the concept of commutation in partial derivatives within tensor calculus
  • Investigate the role of the vector potential \(A^{\nu}\) in electromagnetic theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and general relativity, as well as students studying advanced physics concepts related to tensor calculus and field theory.

ercagpince
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Inhomogenous maxwell equation

Homework Statement


In relativistic notation , the field strenght tensor can be expressed as (A is the vector potential) as on eq.(1.1) .

The inhomogenous Maxwell equations can be written as on eq.(1.2) .
Why did covariant "nu" changed sides with "mu" and become contravariant on the second term of left hand side of the equation 1.2 when one take the derivative of eq.(1.3) by
[tex]\partial_{\nu}[/tex]?


Homework Equations


[tex]F^{\mu\nu}=\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}[/tex] (1.1)

[tex]\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}=\frac{4\Pi}{c}J^{\nu}[/tex] (1.2)

[tex]\partial_{\mu}F^{\mu\nu}=\frac{4\Pi}{c}J^{\nu}[/tex] (1.3)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to contract all terms in the eq.(1.2) , however , I couldn't find a quantitative way to solve the problem .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ercagpince said:
Why did covariant "nu" changed sides with "mu" and become contravariant on the second term of left hand side of the equation 1.2 when one take the derivative of eq.(1.3) by
[tex]\partial_{\nu}[/tex]?

The author didn't take the derivative [itex]\partial_{\nu}[/itex], he took the derivative [itex]\partial_{\mu}[/itex]. In the second term of the left hand side he simply commuted [itex]\partial^{\nu}[/itex] and [itex]\partial_{\mu}[/itex].
 
thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K