Why do almost all rivers in the world flow North to South?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sevensages
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the claim that almost all rivers in the world flow from North to South, exploring the reasons behind river flow directions, geographical biases, and the implications of gravity on river currents. Participants examine various examples of rivers and their flow directions, as well as the factors influencing these patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that most rivers flow North to South, suggesting that this is not accurate.
  • Others provide examples of rivers that flow North, including the Nile, Trent, Mersey, Rhine, Garonne, Elbe, Oder, and Vistula, indicating a significant number of rivers defy the initial claim.
  • Some participants propose that geographical features, such as deserts, may influence river flow directions, particularly in Africa.
  • There is mention of a general tendency for rivers to flow downhill, with some participants noting that South is often at the bottom of maps, which may influence perceptions of river flow.
  • Discussion includes the observation that there is less land in the Southern Hemisphere, which may contribute to the perception that more rivers flow in the Northern Hemisphere.
  • Some participants highlight that rivers flow towards oceans and seas, suggesting that geographical biases in land and water distribution could affect river flow directions.
  • There is a suggestion that the definition of "flowing south" may need clarification, as it could refer to the outlet direction rather than the overall flow path.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the claim that almost all rivers flow from North to South. Multiple competing views are presented, with some participants asserting that many rivers flow North and others questioning the validity of the original statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and geographical factors influencing river flow, and there are unresolved questions about the influence of climate and geography on river systems.

  • #31
BWV said:
I meant that tongue in cheek ...
Ah. That was not at all apparent.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
Ah. That was not at all apparent.
There was a ;) in the post
 
  • #33
BWV said:
There was a ;) in the post
Not that I can see. (And I had checked first, cuz I was gonna suggest a smiley might be warranted.)
 
  • #34
DaveC426913 said:
Not that I can see. (And I had checked first, cuz I was gonna suggest a smiley might be warranted.)
1702436666023.png


;)
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
  • #35
Here is a global map of continental divides, a lot of drainage to N,W and E

1702437645696.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein and Vanadium 50
  • #36
BWV said:
Here is a global map of continental divides, a lot of drainage to N,W and E
As well as the ... fifth cardinal direction, I guess?
Downward? Inward? (Endorheic)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #37
DaveC426913 said:
As well as the ... fifth cardinal direction, I guess?
Downward? Inward? (Endorheic)

:smile:

 
  • #38
sevensages said:
TL;DR Summary: Why do almost all rivers in the world flow from North to South?

I recently heard the narrator of a podcast state that the current of almost all rivers in the world flows from North to South. The narrator said the Nile River is one of very few rivers in the world that flows from South to North.

I cannot figure out why almost all rivers in the world have a current that flows from North to South. It is my understanding that gravity is the force that drives the current in rivers. Gravity causes the water in a river to move toward the lowest ground possible. So if almost all rivers in the world flow North to South, it seems like the lowest ground at the end of almost all rivers would be at the southern most point of the river. But why would the lowest point at the end of almost all rivers be at the southern most end of a river? To me, I don't see any reason why the flow of rivers would not be divided roughly equal with approximately 25% flowing to the South, 25% flowing to the North, 25% flowing to the East, and roughly 25% flowing to the West.

Why does the current of almost all rivers in the world flow from North to South?
While I'm finding a lot of the comments entertaining, I have three things I'd like to reinforce/add:
Rivers flow in all directions. If you look at any large body of water (ocean or lake) or any major river:
Tributaries/rivers joining said body of water:
From the South will flow North into this body of water.
From the West will flow East into this body of water.
From the North will flow South into this body of water.
From the East will flow West into this body of water.
Water flows downhill, period.
I was falsely taught in grade school that almost every river flows South. I come across this statement frequently, and, what I want to know is: Where does it come from? I think there must have been a geography book from the 40's or 50's that taught this, because frequently it's boomers who state this (I'm 66).
 
  • #39
Iceman81 said:
Where does it come from?
I'd guess that most geography lessons concentrated on the middle latitudes where the bulk of the population resides, myopically analogous to the way that Western maps habitually used to put NorthAm at the centre, thus:

1702765950811.png
 
  • #40
sevensages said:
Ok.....maybe the narrator was wrong
That is a very specific answer, but not very satisfying. The Rhine and the Elbe (maybe) could be called world-class rivers. Have you ever seen the Mersey or the Trent? And it's very geopolitically biased. How about the Congo? The Mekong, the Yellow Rivers? The continental divide map is the best response. But I bet if you list all the world rivers, using a liter/minute flow as a standard, you would find a slight north-south bias.

[Post edited by a Mentor]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #41
The fact that a podcast narrator says a thing is meaningless. I have heard podcasters make all sorts of wrong statements while speaking with apparent total conviction. No matter the credentials of any speaker, absolutist claims about "all rivers" may be considered a red flag of caution, as I doubt anyone alive has examined them all.

I see no evidence whatsoever to believe the given assertion about rivers, as I can think of multiple counter examples, including large rivers.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, Hornbein and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K